Cunningham P J
Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC 20024, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):255-70.
To examine the effects of managed care penetration and the uninsurance rate in an area on access to care of low-income uninsured persons and to compare differences in access between low-income insured and uninsured persons across these different market areas.
Primarily the Community Tracking Study household survey. Other market-level data were obtained from the Community Tracking Study physician survey, American Hospital Association annual survey of hospitals, Area Resource File, HCFA Administrative Data, Bureau of Primary Care data on Community Health Centers.
Individuals are grouped based on the level of managed care penetration and uninsurance rate in the site where they reside. Measures of managed care include overall managed care penetration in the site, and the level of Medicaid managed care penetration in the state. Uninsurance rate is defined as the percentage of people uninsured in the site. Measures of access include the percentage with a usual source of care, percentage with any ambulatory care use, and percentage of persons who reported unmet medical care needs. Estimates are adjusted to control for other confounding factors, including both individual and market-level characteristics.
A survey, primarily telephoned, of households concentrated in 60 sites, defined as metropolitan statistical areas and nonmetropolitan areas.
Access to care for low-income uninsured persons is lower in states with high Medicaid managed care penetration, compared to uninsured persons in states with low Medicaid managed care penetration. Access to care for low-income uninsured persons is also lower in areas with high uninsurance rates. The "access gap" (differences in access between insured and uninsured persons) is also larger in areas with high Medicaid managed care penetration and areas with high uninsurance rates.
Efforts to achieve cost savings under managed care may result in financial pressures that limit cross-subsidization of care to the medically indigent, particularly for those providers who are heavily dependent on Medicaid revenue. High demand for care (as reflected in high uninsurance rates) may further strain limited resources for indigent care, further limiting access to care for uninsured persons.
研究某地区管理式医疗渗透率和未参保率对低收入未参保者获得医疗服务的影响,并比较不同市场区域中低收入参保者和未参保者在获得医疗服务方面的差异。
主要是社区追踪研究家庭调查。其他市场层面的数据来自社区追踪研究医生调查、美国医院协会年度医院调查、区域资源文件、医保财务管理局行政数据、基层医疗局关于社区卫生中心的数据。
根据个体居住地点的管理式医疗渗透率和未参保率水平进行分组。管理式医疗的衡量指标包括该地点的总体管理式医疗渗透率以及该州医疗补助管理式医疗渗透率水平。未参保率定义为该地点未参保人口的百分比。获得医疗服务的衡量指标包括有常规医疗服务来源的人口百分比、有任何门诊医疗服务使用的人口百分比以及报告有未满足医疗需求的人口百分比。估计值经过调整以控制其他混杂因素,包括个体和市场层面的特征。
对集中在60个地点(定义为大都市统计区和非大都市地区)的家庭进行调查,主要通过电话进行。
与医疗补助管理式医疗渗透率低的州的未参保者相比,医疗补助管理式医疗渗透率高的州中低收入未参保者获得医疗服务的机会更低。在未参保率高的地区,低收入未参保者获得医疗服务的机会也更低。在医疗补助管理式医疗渗透率高的地区和未参保率高的地区,“获得医疗服务差距”(参保者和未参保者在获得医疗服务方面的差异)也更大。
在管理式医疗模式下实现成本节约的努力可能会导致财务压力,从而限制对贫困患者医疗服务的交叉补贴,特别是对于那些严重依赖医疗补助收入的提供者而言。对医疗服务的高需求(如高未参保率所反映)可能会进一步使贫困患者的有限资源紧张,进一步限制未参保者获得医疗服务的机会。