Sabri O, Zimny M, Schulz G, Schreckenberger M, Reinartz P, Willmes K, Buell U
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aachen University of Technology, Germany.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Apr;84(4):1229-33. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.4.5588.
There is controversy whether simultaneous thyrostatic medication influences the outcome of radioiodine (131I) therapy in Graves' disease by reducing the absorbed energy dose of 131I when delivering a standard dose. We therefore sought to ascertain whether the outcome of ablative 131I therapy is in any way affected by simultaneous thyrostasis (carbimazole) by aiming for a constant absorbed dose of 200-250 Gy. We prospectively studied 207 patients with Graves' disease (106 with and 101 without simultaneous carbimazole at the time of 131I therapy). All patients were reexamined 3, 6, and 12 months after 131I therapy. The 101 nonthyrostatic patients showed a highly significantly greater success rate (93%) than the 106 thyrostatic patients (49%). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that failure was related to the administration of carbimazole during 131I therapy (P < 0.00005) and the absorbed dose (P < 0.025), but was not related to free T3, free T4, TSH receptor antibodies, or thyroid volume. The success rate was 100% in 93 nonthyrostatic patients with absorbed doses of 200 Gy or more, but was only 12.5% (1 of 8) for absorbed doses less than 200 Gy. Correlation between success and absorbed dose was significantly higher for nonthyrostatic than for thyrostatic patients (r = 0.93 vs. r = 0.24). Sixteen patients who discontinued thyrostasis 1-3 days before 131I therapy showed 94% successes. Simultaneous thyrostasis is the decisive factor against a successful 131I therapy even if the significantly reduced 131I uptake/half-life values under thyrostasis are compensated with a higher delivered dose to ensure a comparable absorbed dose, possibly due to the additionally effective radioprotective properties of carbimazole. Therefore, if clinically feasible, we recommend discontinuing thyrostasis at least 1 day before beginning 131I therapy, because even in hyperthyroid nonthyrostatic patients the success rate was 100%.
对于在给予标准剂量的放射性碘(¹³¹I)时,同时使用抗甲状腺药物是否会通过降低¹³¹I的吸收能量剂量而影响格雷夫斯病的¹³¹I治疗效果,存在争议。因此,我们试图通过设定200 - 250 Gy的恒定吸收剂量,来确定同时进行的甲状腺功能抑制(使用卡比马唑)是否会以任何方式影响¹³¹I消融治疗的效果。我们前瞻性地研究了207例格雷夫斯病患者(106例在¹³¹I治疗时同时使用卡比马唑,101例未使用)。所有患者在¹³¹I治疗后3、6和12个月进行复查。101例未进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者成功率(93%)显著高于106例进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者(49%)。逐步逻辑回归显示,治疗失败与¹³¹I治疗期间使用卡比马唑(P < 0.00005)和吸收剂量(P < 0.025)有关,但与游离T3、游离T4、促甲状腺激素受体抗体或甲状腺体积无关。93例吸收剂量为200 Gy或更高的未进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者成功率为100%,但吸收剂量低于200 Gy的患者成功率仅为12.5%(8例中的1例)。未进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者中,成功与吸收剂量之间的相关性显著高于进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者(r = 0.93对r = 0.24)。16例在¹³¹I治疗前1 - 3天停止甲状腺功能抑制的患者成功率为94%。即使在甲状腺功能抑制状态下显著降低的¹³¹I摄取/半衰期值通过给予更高剂量来补偿以确保可比的吸收剂量,同时进行的甲状腺功能抑制仍是¹³¹I治疗成功的决定性因素,这可能是由于卡比马唑额外的有效辐射防护特性。因此,如果临床可行,我们建议在开始¹³¹I治疗前至少1天停止甲状腺功能抑制,因为即使是甲状腺功能亢进且未进行甲状腺功能抑制的患者成功率也为100%。