Corren J, Rachelefsky G, Spector S, Schanker H, Siegel S, Holton D, Karcher K, Travers S
Allergy Research Foundation, Inc, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Apr;103(4):574-80. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70226-5.
Although prior studies have documented the rapid onset of action of topical intranasal levocabastine (LEV), little is known about its duration of action under nasal challenge conditions.
We sought to assess the onset and duration of action of escalating doses of LEV nasal spray by using a nasal allergen challenge (NAC) model.
Eighteen asymptomatic subjects with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled into a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging crossover study. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive single doses of placebo and intranasal LEV 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg during 2 parts of the study. In part 1 (onset of action), NAC consisted of a single dose of allergen administered 5 minutes after study drug treatment. In part 2 (duration of action), NAC consisted of increasing doses of allergen administered 0.5, 6, 12, and 24 hours on separate days after study drug treatment. Nasal symptom scores (NSSs) and nasal peak expiratory flow rates were measured after NAC in both phases of the study. Blood samples for plasma LEV concentrations were drawn after each NAC.
In part 1, NSSs were significantly lower after the administration of LEV 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg compared with placebo (P <.05). In part 2, NSSs were significantly lower after LEV doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg compared with placebo at 0.5, 6, 12, and 24 hours after treatment (P <.05). The mean provocative dose of allergen required to elicit a positive nasal reaction was increased after LEV doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg at 0.5, 6, and 12 hours after treatment. Nasal peak expiratory flow rates demonstrated no significant differences between LEV and placebo for any doses at any time points. Mean plasma LEV concentrations were low (range, 0 to 3. 7 ng/mL) after all doses and did not correlate with drug efficacy.
Single intranasal LEV doses of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg significantly reduced the severity of the immediate nasal response to allergen when administered 5 minutes before NAC. This protective effect against NAC continued to be present 24 hours after administration of LEV doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg. Efficacy in blocking the reaction to NAC did not correlate with plasma LEV levels, suggesting that the inhibitory effect was due largely to topical rather than systemic effects.
尽管先前的研究已证明局部鼻用左卡巴斯汀(LEV)起效迅速,但对于其在鼻激发试验条件下的作用持续时间知之甚少。
我们试图通过使用鼻过敏原激发试验(NAC)模型来评估递增剂量的LEV鼻喷雾剂的起效时间和作用持续时间。
18名有季节性变应性鼻炎病史的无症状受试者被纳入一项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照、剂量范围交叉研究。在研究的两个阶段,每位患者被随机分配接受单剂量的安慰剂以及0.1、0.2和0.4毫克的鼻用LEV。在第1部分(起效时间)中,NAC包括在研究药物治疗后5分钟给予单剂量过敏原。在第2部分(作用持续时间)中,NAC包括在研究药物治疗后的不同日期分别于0.5、6、12和24小时给予递增剂量的过敏原。在研究的两个阶段的NAC后均测量鼻症状评分(NSSs)和鼻呼气峰值流速。每次NAC后采集血样以测定血浆LEV浓度。
在第1部分中,与安慰剂相比,给予0.1、0.2和0.4毫克LEV后NSSs显著降低(P<.05)。在第2部分中,与安慰剂相比,在治疗后0.5、6、12和24小时,给予0.2和0.4毫克LEV剂量后NSSs显著降低(P<.05)。在治疗后0.5、6和12小时,给予0.2和0.4毫克LEV剂量后引起阳性鼻反应所需的平均过敏原激发剂量增加。在任何时间点,任何剂量的LEV和安慰剂之间的鼻呼气峰值流速均无显著差异。所有剂量后的平均血浆LEV浓度均较低(范围为0至3.7纳克/毫升),且与药物疗效无关。
在NAC前5分钟给予0.1、0.2和0.4毫克的单剂量鼻用LEV可显著降低对过敏原的即刻鼻反应的严重程度。在给予0.2和0.4毫克LEV剂量后24小时,对NAC的这种保护作用仍然存在。阻断对NAC反应的疗效与血浆LEV水平无关,这表明抑制作用主要是由于局部而非全身作用。