Svensson C, Andersson M, Greiff L, Blychert L O, Persson C G
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Allergy. 1998 Apr;53(4):367-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03907.x.
This study compares the effects of two topical nasal treatments for allergic rhinitis, budesonide and levocabastine, on symptom development during seasonal pollen exposure. Additionally, the protective effects of drug treatments on allergen-challenge-induced responses (symptoms and microvascular exudation of plasma) are examined late into the pollen season. Forty-four patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to birch pollen participated in this single-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. Topical nasal treatment with either levocabastine (200 microg b.i.d.; n = 16), budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.; n = 16), or placebo (n = 12) was instituted before the start of the pollen season and continued for 5 weeks until the end of the birch pollen season. The participants kept diaries for scores of nasal and ocular symptoms. Nasal allergen challenges with increasing doses of a birch pollen extract (10[2], 10[3], and 10[4] SQ-U) were carried out both before, when patients were asymptomatic and without treatment, and late into the pollen season. A nasal lavage followed each challenge, and the lavage fluid levels of albumin were measured as an index of the acute inflammatory response of the allergic mucosa. The birch pollen season was rather mild, producing only small increases in nasal symptoms. Budesonide treatment reduced the total nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01) and to levocabastine (P<0.05), while levocabastine treatment did not differ significantly from placebo. Ocular symptoms and use of rescue medication did not differ between placebo and the active treatments. At the end of the pollen season, both treatments reduced allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01). Only budesonide reduced allergen-challenge-induced increments of albumin levels in postchallenge nasal lavage fluids (P<0.05, in comparison with placebo). The results suggest that budesonide reduces both seasonal and allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms, while levocabastine is effective against allergen-challenge-induced symptoms also during the season. In addition, the topical steroid treatment, but not the antihistamine, inhibits the inflammatory exudation evoked by allergen challenge in patients with active seasonal disease.
本研究比较了两种用于治疗变应性鼻炎的局部鼻腔用药——布地奈德和左卡巴斯汀,在季节性花粉暴露期间对症状发展的影响。此外,还在花粉季节后期考察了药物治疗对变应原激发诱导反应(症状和血浆微血管渗出)的保护作用。44例对桦树花粉患季节性变应性鼻炎的患者参与了这项单盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。在花粉季节开始前开始用左卡巴斯汀(200μg,每日两次;n = 16)、布地奈德(200μg,每日两次;n = 16)或安慰剂(n = 12)进行局部鼻腔治疗,并持续5周直至桦树花粉季节结束。参与者记录鼻腔和眼部症状评分的日记。在患者无症状且未接受治疗时以及花粉季节后期,均用递增剂量的桦树花粉提取物(10[2]、10[3]和10[4] SQ-U)进行鼻腔变应原激发。每次激发后进行鼻腔灌洗,并测量灌洗液中白蛋白水平,作为变应性黏膜急性炎症反应的指标。桦树花粉季节较为温和,仅使鼻腔症状略有增加。与安慰剂相比,布地奈德治疗可减轻总的鼻腔症状(P<0.01),与左卡巴斯汀相比也有减轻(P<0.05),而左卡巴斯汀治疗与安慰剂相比无显著差异。安慰剂与活性治疗组之间的眼部症状和急救药物使用情况无差异。在花粉季节结束时,与安慰剂相比,两种治疗均减轻了变应原激发诱导的鼻腔症状(P<0.01)。只有布地奈德降低了激发后鼻腔灌洗液中变应原激发诱导的白蛋白水平升高(与安慰剂相比,P<0.05)。结果表明,布地奈德可减轻季节性和变应原激发诱导的鼻腔症状,而左卡巴斯汀在季节期间对变应原激发诱导的症状也有效。此外,局部用类固醇治疗而非抗组胺药,可抑制活动性季节性疾病患者变应原激发引起的炎症渗出。