• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

该患者是否患有巴雷特食管?在内镜检查时预测巴雷特食管的效用。

Does this patient have Barrett's esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett's esophagus at the index endoscopy.

作者信息

Eloubeidi M A, Provenzale D

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.990_m.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.990_m.x
PMID:10201460
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have evaluated the ability of the endoscopist to predict the presence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) at index endoscopy. The goals of this study were to determine the operating characteristics of endoscopy in diagnosing BE, and to determine the clinical and endoscopic predictors of BE in suspected BE patients at the index endoscopy.

METHODS

From September 1993 to October 1997, endoscopic reports were examined to identify patients with suspected BE. All esophageal pathology reports during the same period were evaluated for the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4053 endoscopies were performed on 2393 patients. Eight percent of all procedures were performed for suspected or confirmed BE. Fifty-three patients were known to have BE and thus their reports were excluded from this analysis. Five hundred seventy of the remaining patients had esophageal biopsies performed, and were included in this analysis. Among these 570 patients, 146 were suspected to have BE on endoscopy, while 424 were not suspected to have BE at the time of endoscopy. There were no differences among the two groups in terms of gender, race, and dyspepsia as an indication for the endoscopy. However, suspected BE patients were slightly younger and were more likely to have heartburn, but were less likely to have dysphagia as an indication for the endoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of the endoscopists' assessments were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72-92) and 81% (95% CI, 78-84), respectively. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 34% and 97%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.32 (95% CI, 3.49-5.31) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.13-0.38). Univariate analysis showed that endoscopists diagnosed BE in those with long-segment BE (LSBE) more accurately than in those with short-segment BE (SSBE) (55% vs 25% p = 0.001; odds ratio [OR] = 3.63, 95% CI, 1.71-7.70). Barrett's esophagus was correctly diagnosed in 38.5% of white patients but in only 14.7% of black patients (p = 0.01; OR = 3.63, 95% CI, 1.31-10.13). Multivariable logistic regression identified only the length of the columnar-appearing segment (p = 0.002; OR = 3.33, 95% CI, 1.54-7.17) and race (p = 0.08; OR = 2.31, 95% CI, 0.88-6.03) to be associated with the presence of BE on biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Barrett's esophagus is frequently suspected at endoscopy; SSBE was more frequently suspected than LSBE, but was correctly diagnosed only 25% of the time, versus 55% for LSBE. Endoscopists diagnosed BE with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 81%. However, the positive predictive value was only 34%, whereas the negative predictive value was 97%. The length of the columnar-appearing segment is the strongest predictor of BE at endoscopy. Alternative methods are needed to better identify BE patients endoscopically, especially those with SSBE.

摘要

目的

很少有研究评估内镜医师在初次内镜检查时预测巴雷特食管(BE)存在的能力。本研究的目的是确定内镜检查在诊断BE方面的操作特征,并确定初次内镜检查时疑似BE患者中BE的临床和内镜预测因素。

方法

从1993年9月至1997年10月,检查内镜报告以识别疑似BE的患者。评估同期所有食管病理报告中是否存在特殊肠化生。

结果

在研究期间,对2393例患者进行了4053次内镜检查。所有检查中有8%是针对疑似或确诊的BE进行的。已知有53例患者患有BE,因此他们的报告被排除在本分析之外。其余患者中有570例进行了食管活检,并纳入本分析。在这570例患者中,146例在内镜检查时疑似患有BE,而424例在内镜检查时未被怀疑患有BE。两组在性别、种族和作为内镜检查指征的消化不良方面无差异。然而,疑似BE的患者年龄稍小,更有可能有烧心症状,但作为内镜检查指征出现吞咽困难的可能性较小。内镜医师评估的敏感性和特异性分别为82%(95%置信区间[CI],72 - 92)和81%(95%CI,78 - 84)。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为34%和97%。阳性似然比为4.32(95%CI,3.49 - 5.31),阴性似然比为0.22(95%CI,0.13 - 0.38)。单因素分析显示,内镜医师诊断长段BE(LSBE)患者的BE比短段BE(SSBE)患者更准确(55%对25%,p = 0.001;优势比[OR] = 3.63,95%CI,1.71 - 7.7)。38.5%的白人患者被正确诊断为BE,而黑人患者中只有14.7%(p = 0.01;OR = 3.63,95%CI,1.31 - 10.13)。多变量逻辑回归分析仅确定柱状外观段的长度(p = 0.002;OR = 3.33,95%CI,1.54 - 7.17)和种族(p = 0.08;OR = 2.31,95%CI,0.88 - 6.03)与活检时BE的存在相关。

结论

内镜检查时经常怀疑有巴雷特食管;短段BE比长段BE更常被怀疑,但仅25%的时间能被正确诊断,而长段BE为55%。内镜医师诊断BE的敏感性为82%,特异性为81%。然而,阳性预测值仅为34%,而阴性预测值为97%。柱状外观段的长度是内镜检查时BE最强的预测因素。需要其他方法来更好地在内镜下识别BE患者,尤其是短段BE患者。

相似文献

1
Does this patient have Barrett's esophagus? The utility of predicting Barrett's esophagus at the index endoscopy.该患者是否患有巴雷特食管?在内镜检查时预测巴雷特食管的效用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.990_m.x.
2
Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with short and long segment Barrett's esophagus.短节段和长节段巴雷特食管患者的食管测压及动态24小时pH监测
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;93(6):916-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00276.x.
3
Short segment Barrett's esophagus: relationship of age with extent of intestinal metaplasia.短节段巴雷特食管:年龄与肠化生范围的关系。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Nov;96(11):3084-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05262.x.
4
Clinical, endoscopic, and functional studies in 408 patients with Barrett's esophagus, compared to 174 cases of intestinal metaplasia of the cardia.对408例巴雷特食管患者进行了临床、内镜及功能研究,并与174例贲门肠化生病例进行了比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;97(3):554-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05529.x.
5
Barrett's esophagus: a discrepancy between macroscopic and histological diagnosis.巴雷特食管:宏观诊断与组织学诊断之间的差异。
Endoscopy. 2005 Nov;37(11):1131-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870409.
6
Progression or regression of Barrett's esophagus--is it all in the eye of the beholder?巴雷特食管的进展或消退——这完全取决于观察者的判断吗?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;98(12):2612-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07680.x.
7
[The influence of Barrett's esophagus on the clinical signs and postoperative results of GERD].[巴雷特食管对胃食管反流病临床症状及术后结果的影响]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):99-103. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-816278.
8
Accuracy of endoscopic optical coherence tomography in the detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective, double-blinded study.内镜光学相干断层扫描在检测巴雷特食管发育异常中的准确性:一项前瞻性双盲研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Dec;62(6):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.048.
9
Utilization of cytokeratins 7 and 20 does not differentiate between Barrett's esophagus and gastric cardiac intestinal metaplasia.细胞角蛋白7和20的应用无法区分巴雷特食管和胃贲门肠化生。
Mod Pathol. 2002 Jun;15(6):611-6. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880574.
10
Frequency of Barrett's neoplasia after initial negative endoscopy with biopsy: a long-term histopathological follow-up study.初次内镜检查活检结果为阴性后巴雷特肿瘤的发生频率:一项长期组织病理学随访研究
Endoscopy. 2006 Dec;38(12):1201-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944993.

引用本文的文献

1
Tethered optoacoustic and optical coherence tomography capsule endoscopy for label-free assessment of Barrett's oesophageal neoplasia.用于对巴雷特食管肿瘤进行无标记评估的束缚式光声和光学相干断层扫描胶囊内镜
Nat Biomed Eng. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01462-0.
2
Endoscopic Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.内镜技术在胃食管反流病诊断和治疗中的进展
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 11;60(7):1120. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071120.
3
Adjunctive Use of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling-3D in Patients With Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Increases Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Dysplasia.
辅助使用全层黏膜活检-3D 技术增加对有症状胃食管反流病患者 Barrett 食管及异型增生的检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):1990-2001. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002818. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Advanced Endoscopic Imaging and Interventions in GERD: An Update and Future Directions.胃食管反流病的先进内镜成像与干预:最新进展及未来方向
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 29;8:728696. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728696. eCollection 2021.
5
Towards screening Barrett's oesophagus: current guidelines, imaging modalities and future developments.迈向巴雷特食管筛查:现行指南、成像方式及未来发展
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;13(5):635-649. doi: 10.1007/s12328-020-01135-2. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Novel Screening Tests for Barrett's Esophagus.巴雷特食管的新型筛查试验
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Jul 25;21(9):42. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0710-9.
7
Benefits of the Seattle biopsy protocol in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus in a Chinese population.西雅图活检方案在中国人群巴雷特食管诊断中的益处。
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Nov 26;6(14):753-758. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.753.
8
Barrett's oesophagus: A qualitative study of patient burden, care delivery experience and follow-up needs.巴雷特食管:患者负担、护理提供体验和随访需求的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):21-33. doi: 10.1111/hex.12817. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Inter-endoscopist agreement in diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus.内镜医师之间对巴雷特食管诊断的一致性。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;2(3):162-167. doi: 10.1136/fg.2010.001529. Epub 2011 Mar 20.
10
Short-Segment Barrett's Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma.短节段巴雷特食管与腺癌
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2006 Feb;2(2):134-139.