Chapman K R, Ringdal N, Backer V, Palmqvist M, Saarelainen S, Briggs M
Toronto Hospital, Western Division, Toronto, Canada.
Can Respir J. 1999 Jan-Feb;6(1):45-51. doi: 10.1155/1999/894803.
To compare the efficacy and safety of a new combination Diskus inhaler containing both salmeterol 50 mg and fluticasone propionate 250 mg (Seretide) with the two drugs delivered via separate Diskus inhalers.
A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study. Three hundred and seventy-one symptomatic asthma patients (age range 13 to 75 years, mean 42 years) receiving inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: 28 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg bid) via a single Diskus inhaler (combination) and placebo bid via another Diskus inhaler, or salmeterol 50 microg bid via one Diskus inhaler and fluticasone propionate 250 microg bid via another (concurrent). Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and symptoms were measured for the first 12 weeks and safety data were collected throughout the study.
Over weeks 1 to 12, adjusted mean improvements in morning PEFR were 43 and 36 L/min for combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The difference between the two treatment arms was 6 L/min (90% CI -13 to 0 L/min; P=0.114), which was within the predefined criteria for clinical equivalence. Adjusted mean improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline for week 28 were also similar between the two therapies. Thirty-five per cent of patients receiving combination inhaler and 31% of those receiving concurrent therapy had a mean daytime symptom score of zero over weeks 1 to 12 compared with 1% and 2%, respectively, at baseline. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two treatment arms. Mean serum cortisol levels were similar, and no differences in frequency of abnormal results were noted between the two groups.
This study shows that the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in a single inhaler is as efficacious in achieving asthma control and as well tolerated over a 28-week period as the two drugs administered individually.
比较一种新的联合使用的都保吸入器(含50毫克沙美特罗和250毫克丙酸氟替卡松,即舒利迭)与通过两个单独的都保吸入器分别递送这两种药物的疗效和安全性。
一项多中心、双盲、双模拟研究。371例接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗的有症状哮喘患者(年龄范围13至75岁,平均42岁)被随机分为两个治疗组:一组通过单个都保吸入器接受沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(50/250微克,每日两次)治疗28周(联合组),并通过另一个都保吸入器接受安慰剂每日两次治疗;另一组通过一个都保吸入器接受50微克沙美特罗每日两次治疗,通过另一个都保吸入器接受250微克丙酸氟替卡松每日两次治疗(同时使用组)。在最初12周测量晨峰呼气流量率(PEFR)和症状,并在整个研究过程中收集安全性数据。
在第1至12周期间,联合治疗组和同时使用组晨PEFR的调整后平均改善分别为每分钟43升和36升。两个治疗组之间的差异为每分钟6升(90%可信区间为-13至0升/分钟;P = 0.114),这在临床等效性的预定义标准范围内。两种治疗方法在第28周时1秒用力呼气容积相对于基线的调整后平均改善也相似。在第1至12周期间,接受联合吸入器治疗的患者中有35%、接受同时使用治疗组的患者中有31%的日间症状平均评分为零,而在基线时这一比例分别为1%和2%。两个治疗组之间不良事件的发生率没有差异。平均血清皮质醇水平相似,两组之间异常结果的频率也没有差异。
本研究表明,在一个吸入器中联合使用沙美特罗和丙酸氟替卡松在实现哮喘控制方面与分别使用这两种药物同样有效,并且在28周的时间内耐受性良好。