Ducharme Francine M, Ni Chroinin Muireann, Greenstone Ilana, Lasserson Toby J
Research Centre, CHU Sainte-Justine and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, 3175 Cote Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Québec, Canada, H3T 1C5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.pub2.
In asthmatic patients inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids and/or those with moderate persistent asthma, two main options are recommended: the combination of a long-acting inhaled ss2 agonist (LABA) with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or use of a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids.
To determine the effect of the combination of long-acting ss(2) agonists and inhaled corticosteroids compared to a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids on the risk of asthma exacerbations, pulmonary function and on other measures of asthma control, and to look for characteristics associated with greater benefit for either treatment option.
We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through electronic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL), bibliographies of RCTs, clinical trial registries and correspondence with manufacturers until May 2008.
RCTs that compared the combination of inhaled LABA and ICS to a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids, in children and adults with asthma.
Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. We obtained confirmation from the trialists when possible. The primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids.
This review included 48 studies (15,155 participants including 1155 children and 14,000 adults). Participants were inadequately controlled on their current ICS regimen, experiencing ongoing symptoms and with generally moderate (FEV1 60% to 79% of predicted) airway obstruction. The studies tested the combination of salmeterol or formoterol with a median dose of 400 mcg/day of beclomethasone or equivalent (BDP-eq) compared to a median of 1000 mcg/day of BDP-eq, usually for 24 weeks or less. There was a statistically significantly lower risk of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids in patients treated with LABA and ICS (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98, 27 studies, N = 10,578) from 11.45% to 10%, with a number needed to treat of 73 (median study duration: 12 weeks). The study results were dominated by adult studies; trial data from three paediatric studies showed a trend towards increased risk of rescue oral steroids (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.66) and hospital admission (RR 2.21, 95% CI 0.74 to 6.64) associated with combination therapy. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk ratios for either hospital admission (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.56) or serious adverse events (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.37). The combination of LABA and ICS resulted in significantly greater but modest improvement from baseline in lung function, symptoms and rescue medication use than with higher ICS dose. Despite no significant group difference in the risk of overall adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03), there was an increase in the risk of tremor (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.82) and a lower risk of oral thrush (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.86)) in the LABA and ICS compared to the higher ICS group. There was no significant difference in hoarseness or headache between the treatment groups. The rate of withdrawals due to poor asthma control favoured the combination of LABA and ICS (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents and adults with sub-optimal control on low dose ICS monotherapy, the combination of LABA and ICS is modestly more effective in reducing the risk of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids than a higher dose of ICS. Combination therapy also led to modestly greater improvement in lung function, symptoms and use of rescue ss(2) agonists and to fewer withdrawals due to poor asthma control than with a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Apart from an increased rate of tremor and less oral candidiasis with combination therapy, the two options appear relatively safe in adults although adverse effects associated with long-term ICS treatment were seldom monitored. In children, combination therapy did not lead to a significant reduction, but rather a trend towards an increased risk, of oral steroid-treated exacerbations and hospital admissions. These trends raised concern about the safety of combination therapy in view of modest improvement in children under the age of 12 years.
对于吸入糖皮质激素治疗控制不佳的哮喘患者和/或中度持续性哮喘患者,推荐两种主要治疗方案:长效吸入β2受体激动剂(LABA)与吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)联合使用,或使用更高剂量的吸入糖皮质激素。
确定长效β2受体激动剂与吸入糖皮质激素联合使用相较于更高剂量吸入糖皮质激素,对哮喘急性发作风险、肺功能及其他哮喘控制指标的影响,并寻找与任一治疗方案获益更大相关的特征。
我们通过电子数据库检索(MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL)、随机对照试验的参考文献、临床试验注册库以及与制造商通信,直至2008年5月,以识别随机对照试验(RCT)。
比较吸入LABA与ICS联合使用和更高剂量吸入糖皮质激素的RCT,研究对象为儿童和成人哮喘患者。
两位作者独立评估方法学质量并提取数据。如有可能,我们从试验者处获得确认。主要终点是经历一次或多次需要口服糖皮质激素的哮喘急性发作的患者数量。
本综述纳入48项研究(15155名参与者,包括1155名儿童和14000名成人)。参与者当前的ICS治疗方案控制不佳,有持续症状,且气道阻塞一般为中度(FEV1为预测值的60%至79%)。研究比较了沙美特罗或福莫特罗与中位剂量为400微克/天的倍氯米松或等效药物(BDP - eq)联合使用,与中位剂量为1000微克/天的BDP - eq相比,通常治疗24周或更短时间。接受LABA与ICS治疗的患者发生需要全身使用糖皮质激素的急性发作风险在统计学上显著降低(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.78至0.98,27项研究,N = 10578),从11.45%降至10%,需治疗人数为73(中位研究持续时间:12周)。研究结果以成人研究为主;三项儿科研究的试验数据显示,联合治疗有使抢救性口服类固醇风险增加(RR 1.24,95%CI 0.58至2.66)和住院风险增加(RR 2.21,95%CI 0.74至6.64)的趋势。总体而言,住院风险比(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.67至1.56)或严重不良事件风险比(RR 1.12,95%CI 0.91至1.37)无统计学显著差异。与更高剂量ICS相比,LABA与ICS联合使用使肺功能、症状和急救药物使用从基线水平有显著更大但适度的改善。尽管总体不良事件风险无显著组间差异(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.95至1.03),但与更高剂量ICS组相比,LABA与ICS联合使用时震颤风险增加(RR 1.84,95%CI 1.20至2.82),鹅口疮风险降低(RR 0.58,95%CI 0.40至0.86)。治疗组之间声音嘶哑或头痛无显著差异。因哮喘控制不佳导致的退出率有利于LABA与ICS联合使用(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.51至0.83)。
在低剂量ICS单药治疗控制欠佳的青少年和成人中,LABA与ICS联合使用在降低需要口服糖皮质激素的急性发作风险方面比更高剂量的ICS略有效。联合治疗在肺功能、症状及急救β2受体激动剂使用方面也有略更大的改善,且因哮喘控制不佳导致的退出人数比更高剂量吸入糖皮质激素治疗更少。除联合治疗时震颤发生率增加和口腔念珠菌病减少外,这两种方案在成人中似乎相对安全,尽管很少监测与长期ICS治疗相关的不良反应。在儿童中,联合治疗并未显著降低而是有使口服类固醇治疗的急性发作和住院风险增加的趋势。鉴于12岁以下儿童改善程度有限,这些趋势引发了对联合治疗安全性的担忧。