Suppr超能文献

五个中心之间头影测量参考值的差异:与欧洲腭裂研究的相关性。

Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study.

作者信息

Trenouth M J, Laitung G, Naftel A J

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Feb;37(1):19-24. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1998.0423.

Abstract

Cephalometric data from five different geographical areas (Oslo, Manchester, London, Nijmegen, and Michigan) were compared. The angles SNA, SNB, and ANB were taken from published tables in the form of mean, standard deviation (SD) and number in the sample, divided up by age and sex. Angles SNA and SNB were significantly different among centres on univariate analysis. The Oslo data showed 23 instances in which they differed significantly from the other data, London 16, Manchester 11, Nijmegen 11, and Michigan 7. Multivariate analysis using Penrose distances were Oslo (2.04), Manchester (1.39), London (0.93), Nijmegen (0.80), and Michigan (0.66). The sums of the Mahalanobis distances were Nijmegen (3.60), Oslo (3.10), London (2.80), Manchester (2.25), and Michigan (1.49). As these results probably reflect racial and genetic differences, these must be taken into account when international comparisons are being made, as in the Eurocleft study.

摘要

对来自五个不同地理区域(奥斯陆、曼彻斯特、伦敦、奈梅亨和密歇根)的头影测量数据进行了比较。SNA、SNB和ANB角的数据取自已发表的表格,表格形式为样本中的均值、标准差(SD)和数量,并按年龄和性别进行了划分。单因素分析显示,各中心之间的SNA角和SNB角存在显著差异。奥斯陆的数据显示有23例与其他数据存在显著差异,伦敦有16例,曼彻斯特有11例,奈梅亨有11例,密歇根有7例。使用彭罗斯距离的多因素分析结果为:奥斯陆(2.04)、曼彻斯特(1.39)、伦敦(0.93)、奈梅亨((0.80)和密歇根(0.66)。马氏距离总和分别为:奈梅亨(3.60)、奥斯陆(3.10)、伦敦(2.80)、曼彻斯特(2.25)和密歇根(1.49)。由于这些结果可能反映了种族和遗传差异,因此在进行国际比较时,如欧洲腭裂研究,必须考虑到这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验