Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, Kasprzaka Str. 17a, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):503-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0420-z. Epub 2010 May 15.
The objective of this study is to compare dental arch relationship following one-stage and three-stage surgical protocols of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Dental casts of 61 children (mean age, 11.2 years; SD, 1.7), consecutively treated in one center with one-stage closure of the complete cleft at 9.2 months (SD, 2.0), were compared with a sample of 97 patients (mean age, 8.7 years; SD, 0.9), consecutively treated with a three-stage protocol including delayed hard palate closure in another center. The dental casts were assigned random numbers to blind their origin. Four raters graded dental arch relationship and palatal morphology using the EUROCRAN index. The strength of agreement of rating was assessed with kappa statistics. Independent t tests were run to compare the EUROCRAN scores between one-stage and three-stage samples, and Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate differences of distribution of the EUROCRAN grades. The intra- and inter-rater agreement was moderate to very good. Dental arch relationship in the one-stage sample was less favorable than in three-stage group (mean scores, 2.58 and 1.97 for one-stage and three-stage samples, respectively; p < 0.000). Palatal morphology in the one-stage sample was more favorable than in the three-stage group (mean scores, 1.79 and 1.96 for one-stage and three-stage samples, respectively; p = 0.047). The dental arch relationship following one-stage repair was less favorable than the outcome of three-stage repair. The palatal morphology following one-stage repair, however, was more favorable than the outcome of three-stage repair.
本研究旨在比较单侧唇腭裂一期和三期手术方案后牙弓关系。比较了在一个中心接受一期手术(9.2 个月[SD,2.0]闭合完全性裂隙)的 61 例儿童(平均年龄 11.2 岁,SD 为 1.7)的牙模与另一个中心采用三期方案(包括延迟硬腭闭合)治疗的 97 例患者(平均年龄 8.7 岁,SD 为 0.9)的样本。牙模编号以使其来源保持盲态。4 位评估者使用 EUROCRAN 指数评估牙弓关系和腭部形态。采用 Kappa 统计评估评分的一致性强度。采用独立 t 检验比较一期和三期样本的 EUROCRAN 评分,采用 Fisher 确切检验评估 EUROCRAN 分级分布的差异。评分者内和评分者间的一致性为中度至非常好。一期样本的牙弓关系不如三期组(一期和三期样本的平均得分分别为 2.58 和 1.97;p<0.000)。一期样本的腭部形态优于三期组(一期和三期样本的平均得分分别为 1.79 和 1.96;p=0.047)。一期修复后的牙弓关系不如三期修复后的牙弓关系。然而,一期修复后的腭部形态优于三期修复后的腭部形态。