Wenzel D, Preisler J, Schilling W, Mohorn M, Völckner E, Leonhardt R, Schäfer R, Hoppe H
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1976 Dec 15;31(24):1039-43.
It is reported on the results of a comparative examination of 18 patients with two usual ergometric methods (team pathophysiology of respiration and research group diseases of heart and circulation of the GDR). Referred to the intake of oxygen as a measure for the stress of the cardiorespiratory system by means of the ergometric methods recommended by the research group diseases of heart and circulation significantly higher minute volumes of the heart rate were established. Principal differences in the evidence of the two methods did not appear.
据报道,采用两种常规的测力计法(民主德国的呼吸团队病理生理学以及心脏与循环疾病研究组)对18名患者进行了对比检查。通过心脏与循环疾病研究组推荐的测力计法,将摄氧量作为衡量心肺系统应激的指标,结果显示心率的每分输出量显著更高。两种方法的证据没有出现主要差异。