Suppr超能文献

[心肺功能障碍中的临床测力计法——常用测力计技术的比较]

[Clinical ergometry in cardio-pulmonary functional disorders--a comparison of the usual ergometric technics].

作者信息

Wenzel D, Preisler J, Schilling W, Mohorn M, Völckner E, Leonhardt R, Schäfer R, Hoppe H

出版信息

Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1976 Dec 15;31(24):1039-43.

PMID:1020411
Abstract

It is reported on the results of a comparative examination of 18 patients with two usual ergometric methods (team pathophysiology of respiration and research group diseases of heart and circulation of the GDR). Referred to the intake of oxygen as a measure for the stress of the cardiorespiratory system by means of the ergometric methods recommended by the research group diseases of heart and circulation significantly higher minute volumes of the heart rate were established. Principal differences in the evidence of the two methods did not appear.

摘要

据报道,采用两种常规的测力计法(民主德国的呼吸团队病理生理学以及心脏与循环疾病研究组)对18名患者进行了对比检查。通过心脏与循环疾病研究组推荐的测力计法,将摄氧量作为衡量心肺系统应激的指标,结果显示心率的每分输出量显著更高。两种方法的证据没有出现主要差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验