Suppr超能文献

错分对家族史研究中相对风险估计值的影响。

Effects of misclassification on estimates of relative risk in family history studies.

作者信息

Szatmari P, Jones M B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 1999;16(4):368-81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:4<368::AID-GEPI4>3.0.CO;2-A.

Abstract

Two types of misclassification that commonly occur in family-genetic studies are distinguished: 1) nondifferential misclassification, in which the probability of error as to phenotype (presence or absence of psychiatric disorder) does not depend on exposure status (being kin to a case or control proband) and 2) differential misclassification, in which it does. Nondifferential misclassification of phenotype reduces the observed relative risk towards the null value, sometimes quite dramatically. Differential misclassification can bias the observed relative risk in either direction, depending on the different values of sensitivity and specificity among relatives of cases and controls. The impact of these biases on genetic-epidemiologic studies is reviewed and discussed. In particular, the ability to detect major gene effects from the pattern of relative risks in first-, second-, and third-degree relatives can be severely compromised. Although there are some methods available to correct the effects of nondifferential misclassification, a major priority for family history studies is to minimize differential misclassification.

摘要

家庭遗传研究中通常出现的两种错误分类类型已被区分

1)无差异错误分类,即关于表型(精神疾病的存在或不存在)的错误概率不取决于暴露状态(与病例或对照先证者有亲属关系);2)差异错误分类,即取决于暴露状态。表型的无差异错误分类会使观察到的相对风险向无效值降低,有时幅度相当大。差异错误分类可使观察到的相对风险向任一方向产生偏差,这取决于病例和对照亲属中敏感性和特异性的不同值。本文对这些偏差对遗传流行病学研究的影响进行了综述和讨论。特别是,从一级、二级和三级亲属的相对风险模式中检测主要基因效应的能力可能会受到严重损害。虽然有一些方法可用于校正无差异错误分类的影响,但家族史研究的一个主要优先事项是尽量减少差异错误分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验