Suppr超能文献

氯米帕明与地昔帕明治疗惊恐障碍的双盲交叉对照研究。

A double-blind crossover comparison of clomipramine and desipramine in the treatment of panic disorder.

作者信息

Sasson Y, Iancu I, Fux M, Taub M, Dannon P N, Zohar J

机构信息

Psychiatric Division, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999 Mar;9(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(98)00024-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of clomipramine hydrochloride (CMI), a serotonin reuptake inhibitor with the noradrenergic tricyclic antidepressant agent, and desipramine hydrochloride (DMI) for patients with panic disorder (PD).

METHOD

Following a 2-week, single-blind placebo washout phase, 17 PD outpatients completed a 16-week, double-blind, crossover comparison of CMI and DMI. Key outcome measures included panic attacks frequency, the NIMH Global Scales for Anxiety, Depression and Impairment, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Psychic and Somatic Subscales), Zung Anxiety Inventory (Raw and Index Subscales) and the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale.

RESULTS

Both CMI and DMI led to significant improvement from baseline placebo state in panic attacks frequency and behavioral ratings (p<0.001). CMI led to a greater reduction in the frequency of panic attacks (p=0.028) and was superior to DMI on ratings of anxiety: NIMH Global Anxiety, Zung Anxiety Scale (Raw and Index) and the Spielberger Anxiety Scale. No difference was found between the drugs on the NIMH Global Impairment Scale and the Hamilton Somatic and Psychic Scales.

CONCLUSION

Both drugs appeared to have significant therapeutic effects in patients with PD, but CMI appeared to be more effective. The effectiveness of the serotonergic drug suggests that the role of the serotonergic system in the pathogenesis of PD should be further explored.

摘要

目的

比较5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂盐酸氯米帕明(CMI)与去甲肾上腺素能三环类抗抑郁药盐酸地昔帕明(DMI)治疗惊恐障碍(PD)患者的疗效。

方法

在为期2周的单盲安慰剂洗脱期后,17名PD门诊患者完成了CMI与DMI为期16周的双盲交叉比较。主要疗效指标包括惊恐发作频率、美国国立精神卫生研究所焦虑、抑郁及功能损害整体量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(精神和躯体分量表)、zung焦虑自评量表(原始分和指数分)以及斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表。

结果

CMI和DMI均使惊恐发作频率和行为评分较基线安慰剂状态有显著改善(p<0.001)。CMI使惊恐发作频率有更大程度降低(p=0.028),且在焦虑评分方面优于DMI:美国国立精神卫生研究所整体焦虑量表、zung焦虑自评量表(原始分和指数分)以及斯皮尔伯格焦虑量表。在国立精神卫生研究所整体功能损害量表以及汉密尔顿躯体和精神量表方面,两种药物未发现差异。

结论

两种药物对PD患者似乎均有显著治疗效果,但CMI似乎更有效。5-羟色胺能药物的有效性提示5-羟色胺能系统在PD发病机制中的作用应进一步探索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验