Lague M R, Jungers W L
Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
J Hum Evol. 1999 Apr;36(4):379-99. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0274.
Basic biomechanical principles predict that body size differences and differences in the positional behavior of primates should impact on the design of the locomotor skeleton. Allometric distortions in joint shape might be expected between sexes if the degree of body size dimorphism is substantial and/or if sex-specific differences exist in behavior. Nevertheless, there are few documented cases of sexual dimorphism in the limb joints of hominoids, despite substantial body size dimorphism and some reports of intersexual differences in positional behavior. This study re-examines sexual dimorphism in the hominoid distal humerus using coordinate data, and distinguishes explicitly between degree of dimorphism (i.e., the magnitude of intersexual differences) and pattern of dimorphism (i.e. , the nature of these differences). Using a variety of multivariate morphometric methods (e.g., canonical variates analysis of Mosimann shape variables; Euclidean Distance Matrix Analysis of both form and pattern difference matrices), we address the following issues: (1) do males and females of different species and subspecies (or ethnic groups for humans) maintain similar joint shapes? (2) are multiple patterns of dimorphism evident in this region of hominoids? (3) are differences and similarities in degree and pattern predicted by phylogenetic propinquity and positional behavior? For the most part, our results support earlier findings that sexual dimorphism in the shape of the anthropoid elbow is slight. Of the eight taxa considered here, only the western lowland gorillas exhibited significant differences in the shape of the distal humerus. Gorilla gorilla gorilla also displays a significantly different pattern of dimorphism from the orang-utan. Pattern differences between Andaman Islanders and both mountain gorillas and the orang-utan also approach statistical significance (P<0.06 and P<0.08, respectively). Overall, and despite marked differences in the degree of dimorphism, the knuckle-walking African apes are more similar in patterns of dimorphism to each other than to other taxa (e.g., gorillas are more similar to orang-utans in degree, but more similar to chimpanzees and bonobos in pattern). We could find no definitive "human pattern" in our results and suspect that this is because human upper limbs face less stringent mechanical constraints since they are relieved of locomotor stresses (but we cannot rule out the possibility of undocumented differences among our human groups in sex-specific, work-related activities). We anticipate finding additional pattern differences among anthropoids in articular dimorphism as we add other taxa to our sample (including fossil hominids), and examine other joint systems.
基本生物力学原理预测,灵长类动物的体型差异和位置行为差异应会影响运动骨骼的设计。如果体型两性异形程度很大和/或行为存在性别特异性差异,那么两性之间关节形状的异速生长畸变可能是意料之中的。然而,尽管类人猿存在显著的体型两性异形,并且有一些关于位置行为两性差异的报道,但记录在案的类人猿肢体关节两性异形的案例却很少。本研究使用坐标数据重新审视类人猿肱骨远端的两性异形,并明确区分两性异形程度(即两性差异的大小)和两性异形模式(即这些差异的性质)。使用多种多元形态测量方法(例如,对莫西曼形状变量进行典型变量分析;对形状和模式差异矩阵进行欧几里得距离矩阵分析),我们解决以下问题:(1)不同物种和亚种(或人类的种族群体)的雄性和雌性是否保持相似的关节形状?(2)在类人猿的这个区域是否有多种两性异形模式明显可见?(3)两性异形程度和模式的差异与相似性是否由系统发育亲缘关系和位置行为所预测?在很大程度上,我们的结果支持了早期的研究发现,即类人猿肘部形状的两性异形很轻微。在这里考虑的八个分类单元中,只有西部低地大猩猩在肱骨远端形状上表现出显著差异。西部低地大猩猩与红毛猩猩相比,也表现出显著不同的两性异形模式。安达曼岛民与山地大猩猩和红毛猩猩之间的模式差异也接近统计学显著性(分别为P<0.06和P<0.08)。总体而言,尽管两性异形程度存在明显差异,但指关节行走的非洲猿类在两性异形模式上彼此之间比与其他分类单元更相似(例如,大猩猩在程度上与红毛猩猩更相似,但在模式上与黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩更相似)。我们在结果中找不到明确的“人类模式”,并怀疑这是因为人类上肢面临的机械约束较少,因为它们摆脱了运动压力(但我们不能排除我们的人类群体在性别特异性、与工作相关的活动中存在未记录差异的可能性)。我们预计,随着我们在样本中增加其他分类单元(包括化石原始人类)并检查其他关节系统,会在类人猿关节两性异形中发现更多的模式差异。