• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rapid symptom relief in rhinitis.

作者信息

Bousquet J

机构信息

CHU Montpellier, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, France.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 1999 Mar;29 Suppl 1:25-9.

PMID:10209702
Abstract

In some patients, symptoms of allergic rhinitis can be severe and therefore rapid relief is required. There are many treatment options for allergic rhinitis but histamine H1 blockers and topical corticosteroids represent the first-line treatment. Although the latter drugs are usually very effective on nasal symptoms, their onset of action is around 24 h. Thus drugs that are more rapidly effective are of interest. Recently 400 French specialists (in Allergy, ENT and Pneumology) met together to define the criteria for selecting a drug for the treatment of rhinitis. Twelve criteria were proposed and rapid onset of action (less than 24 h) was among the foremost designated criteria. In the first trial, a comparison of mizolastine (10 mg once daily [od]) with cetirizine (10 mg od) and placebo was carried out in the management of seasonal allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (SAR) with special focus on onset of action. A total of 375 patients were included in this European multicentric, randomized, parallel group and placebo-controlled study. By comparison to placebo, both cetirizine and mizolastine reduced significantly nasal and ocular symptoms during the 28-day follow-up trial. The percentage of responders ranged from 40% in the placebo group to 55% in the mizolastine group and 53% in the cetirizine group. Both active drugs were effective from the first intake with a rapid onset within 2 h. However, mizolastine was more rapidly and more profoundly effective than cetirizine during the first 12 h. A second trial included 257 patients suffering from perennial allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (PAR) in a 4-week double-blind placebo-controlled multicentric study. During the study, patients recorded, using a diary card, ocular and nasal symptoms, including nasal blockage. The mean values of nasal score between day 1, 14 and 28 in the mizolastine group were statistically significantly lower than those in the placebo group. The mean values of ocular score showed a statistical difference in recordings between day 1 and day 14 in favour of the mizolastine group. Mizolastine was an effective drug both in SAR and PAR with a rapid onset of action. Mizolastine relieved symptoms more effectively than cetirizine (SAR) and placebo (SAR and PAR) at the beginning of treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rapid symptom relief in rhinitis.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1999 Mar;29 Suppl 1:25-9.
2
Mizolastine provides effective symptom relief in patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study versus loratadine.咪唑斯汀为常年性变应性鼻炎患者提供有效的症状缓解:一项与氯雷他定对比的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Sep;89(3):304-10. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61959-X.
3
Comparison of mizolastine with loratadine in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.咪唑斯汀与氯雷他定治疗常年性变应性鼻炎的比较。
Rhinology. 1996 Jun;34(2):101-4.
4
Effectiveness of azelastine nasal spray compared with oral cetirizine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂与口服西替利嗪治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者的疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):543-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.04.012.
5
Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and onset of action of mizolastine, cetirizine, and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. MIZOCET Study Group.咪唑斯汀、西替利嗪及安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻结膜炎的疗效、安全性及起效时间比较。MIZOCET研究组
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Oct;83(4):319-25. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62672-5.
6
Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.20毫克比拉斯汀与10毫克西替利嗪及安慰剂用于季节性变应性鼻炎症状治疗的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、平行组研究
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Sep;39(9):1338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03257.x. Epub 2009 May 4.
7
Levocetirizine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults and children.左西替利嗪用于治疗成人和儿童的过敏性鼻炎及慢性特发性荨麻疹。
Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1664-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.015.
8
Comparison of ebastine to cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults.成人季节性过敏性鼻炎中依巴斯汀与西替利嗪的比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Jun;76(6):507-12. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63269-3.
9
A 12-week placebo-controlled study of rupatadine 10 mg once daily compared with cetirizine 10 mg once daily, in the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis.一项为期12周的安慰剂对照研究,比较每日一次服用10毫克卢帕他定与每日一次服用10毫克西替利嗪治疗持续性变应性鼻炎的效果。
Allergy. 2008 Jul;63(7):924-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01668.x.
10
Comparison of efficacy and safety of cetirizine and ebastine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪与依巴斯汀治疗常年性变应性鼻炎的疗效和安全性比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 May;80(5):399-403. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62991-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.西替利嗪和咪唑斯汀在24小时对组胺诱导的皮肤风团和潮红反应的比较活性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;53(3):250-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01551.x.