van Tienhoven G, Voogd A C, Peterse J L, Nielsen M, Andersen K W, Mignolet F, Sylvester R, Fentiman I S, van der Schueren E, van Zijl K, Blichert-Toft M, Bartelink H, van Dongen J A
University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Jan;35(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00301-3.
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrences (LR) after (modified) radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast conserving therapy (BCT), in terms of overall survival and time to subsequent LR, in patients originally treated in two European randomised trials. In EORTC trial 10801 and DBCG trial 82-TM, 1,807 patients with stage I and II breast cancer were randomised to receive MRM or BCT from 1980 to 1989. All patients with a LR in these trials were analysed for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment. Of these, 133 patients had their LR as a first event, the majority within 5 years after initial treatment. The prognostic significance for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment was analysed in uni-, and multivariate analyses for a number of original tumour- and recurrence-related variables. After salvage treatment of LR after MRM or BCT, actuarial survival curves and the actuarial locoregional control curves were similar. The 5-year survival rates were 58% and 59% and the 5-year subsequent loco-regional control rates 62% and 63%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, pN category (P = 0.03), pT category (P = 0.01) and vascular invasion (P = 0.02) of the primary tumour were the only independent prognostic factors for survival, whereas extensive LR (P < 0.001), interval < or = 2 years (P < 0.002) and pN+ at primary treatment (P = 0.004) were significant predictive factors for time to subsequent LR. The type of original treatment (MRM or BCT) did not have any prognostic impact. It is concluded that the survival and time to subsequent LR after treatment for an early loco-regional recurrence after MRM or BCT was similar in these two European randomised trials. This suggests that both after MRM and BCT an early LR is an indicator of a biologically aggressive tumour; early loco-regional relapse carries a poor prognosis and salvage treatment only cures a limited number of patients, whether treated by MRM or BCT originally.
本研究旨在调查并比较在两项欧洲随机试验中最初接受治疗的患者,在(改良)根治性乳房切除术(MRM)或保乳治疗(BCT)后出现局部区域复发(LR)接受治疗后的总体生存率和至后续LR的时间方面的预后情况。在欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)试验10801和丹麦乳腺癌协作组(DBCG)试验82-TM中,1807例I期和II期乳腺癌患者在1980年至1989年期间被随机分配接受MRM或BCT。对这些试验中所有出现LR的患者进行了挽救治疗后的生存情况以及至后续LR时间的分析。其中,133例患者将LR作为首个事件,大多数发生在初始治疗后的5年内。对一些与原发肿瘤和复发相关的变量进行了单因素和多因素分析,以探讨挽救治疗后生存情况和至后续LR时间的预后意义。在MRM或BCT后对LR进行挽救治疗后,精算生存曲线和精算局部区域控制曲线相似。5年生存率分别为58%和59%,5年后续局部区域控制率分别为62%和63%。在多因素分析中,原发肿瘤的pN分类(P = 0.03)、pT分类(P = 0.01)和血管侵犯(P = 0.02)是生存情况的唯一独立预后因素,而广泛LR(P < 0.001)、间隔时间≤2年(P < 0.002)以及初始治疗时pN阳性(P = 0.004)是至后续LR时间的显著预测因素。初始治疗类型(MRM或BCT)对预后没有任何影响。得出结论:在这两项欧洲随机试验中,MRM或BCT后早期局部区域复发接受治疗后的生存情况以及至后续LR的时间相似。这表明无论是在MRM还是BCT后,早期LR都是生物学侵袭性肿瘤的一个指标;早期局部区域复发预后较差,挽救治疗仅能治愈有限数量的患者,无论最初接受的是MRM还是BCT治疗。