Suppr超能文献

局部晚期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗及保守治疗后的局部区域控制

Loco-regional control after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and conservative treatment for locally advanced breast cancer patients.

作者信息

Levy Antonin, Borget Isabelle, Bahri Manel, Arnedos Monica, Rivin Eleonor, Vielh Philippe, Balleyguier Corinne, Rimareix Françoise, Bourgier Céline

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris XI University, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Breast J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12277. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Abstract

Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) has been validated for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate the difference in loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates between BCT and mastectomy in patients receiving radiation therapy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). A retrospective data base was used to identify all patients with breast cancer undergoing NCT from 2002 to 2007. Patients with initial metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis. LRR was compared between those undergoing BCT and mastectomy. Individual variables associated with LRR were evaluated. Two hundred eighty-four patients were included, 111 (39%) underwent BCT and 173 (61%) mastectomy. Almost all patients (99%) in both groups received postoperative radiation. Pathologic complete response was seen in 37 patients, of which 28 underwent BCT (p < 0.001). Patients receiving mastectomy had more invasive lobular carcinoma (p = 0.007) and a higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001) at diagnosis than those with BCT. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the loco-regional control rate was 91% (95% CI: 86-94%). The 10-year LRR rate was similar in the BCT group (9.2% [95% CI: 4.9-16.7%]) and in the mastectomy group (10.7% [95% CI: 5.9-15.2%]; p = 0.8). Ten-year overall survival (OS) rates (63% [95% CI: 46-79%] in the BCT group; 60% [95% CI: 47-73%] in the mastectomy group, p = 0.8) were not statistically different between the two patient populations. Multivariate analysis showed that AJCC stage ≥ III (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.8; p = 0.02), negative PR (HR: 6; 95% CI: 1.2-30.6, p = 0.03), and number of positive lymph nodes ≥3 (HR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9; p = 0.03) were independent predictors of LRR. Ten-year OS was similar in the BCT and in the mastectomy group (p = 0.1). The rate of LRR was low and did not significantly differ between the BCT and the mastectomy group after NCT. Randomized trials assessing whether mastectomy can be safely omitted in selected breast cancer patients (nonstage III tumors or those which do not require adjuvant hormone suppression) which respond to NCT are required.

摘要

保乳治疗(BCT)已在接受辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者中得到验证。我们的目的是评估新辅助化疗(NCT)后接受放疗的患者中,BCT与乳房切除术之间局部区域复发(LRR)率的差异。使用回顾性数据库来识别2002年至2007年间所有接受NCT的乳腺癌患者。初始转移性疾病患者被排除在本分析之外。比较了接受BCT和乳房切除术患者的LRR情况。评估了与LRR相关的个体变量。共纳入284例患者,111例(39%)接受了BCT,173例(61%)接受了乳房切除术。两组中几乎所有患者(99%)都接受了术后放疗。37例患者出现病理完全缓解,其中28例接受了BCT(p<0.001)。与接受BCT的患者相比,接受乳房切除术的患者在诊断时浸润性小叶癌更多(p = 0.007)且美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期更高(p<0.001)。中位随访6.3年时,局部区域控制率为91%(95%CI:86 - 94%)。BCT组的10年LRR率(9.2%[95%CI:4.9 - 16.7%])与乳房切除术组(10.7%[95%CI:5.9 - 15.2%];p = 0.8)相似。两组患者的10年总生存率(OS)(BCT组为63%[95%CI:46 - 79%];乳房切除术组为60%[95%CI:47 - 73%],p = 0.8)无统计学差异。多变量分析显示,AJCC分期≥III(HR:2.6;95%CI:1.2 - 5.8;p = 0.02)、孕激素受体(PR)阴性(HR:6;95%CI:1.2 - 30.6,p = 0.03)以及阳性淋巴结数≥3(HR:2.5;95%CI:1.1 - 5.9;p = 0.03)是LRR的独立预测因素。BCT组和乳房切除术组的10年OS相似(p = 0.1)。NCT后BCT组和乳房切除术组的LRR率较低且无显著差异。需要进行随机试验来评估对于对NCT有反应的特定乳腺癌患者(非III期肿瘤或不需要辅助激素抑制的患者)是否可以安全地省略乳房切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验