Suppr超能文献

肉鸡群中沙门氏菌检测抽样方法的评估

Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks.

作者信息

Skov M N, Carstensen B, Tornøe N, Madsen M

机构信息

Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Arhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 1999 Apr;86(4):695-700. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00715.x.

Abstract

The present study compares four different sampling methods potentially applicable to detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks, based on collection of faecal samples (i) by hand, 300 fresh faecal samples (ii) absorbed on five sheets of paper (iii) absorbed on five pairs of socks (elastic cotton tubes pulled over the boots and termed 'socks') and (iv) by using only one pair of socks. Twenty-three broiler flocks were included in the investigation and 18 of these were found to be positive by at least one method. Seven serotypes of Salmonella with different patterns of transmission (mainly horizontal or vertical) were found in the investigation. The results showed that the sock method (five pairs of socks) had a sensitivity comparable with the hand collection method (60 pools of five faecal samples); the paper collection method was inferior, as was the use of only one pair of socks. Estimation of the effective pool sizes for the different methods was also carried out.

摘要

本研究比较了四种可能适用于检测肉鸡群中沙门氏菌的不同采样方法,这些方法基于粪便样本的采集:(i)手工采集300份新鲜粪便样本;(ii)将粪便样本吸附在五张纸上;(iii)将粪便样本吸附在五双袜子上(将弹性棉管套在靴子上,称为“袜子”);(iv)仅使用一双袜子。调查纳入了23个肉鸡群,其中18个群至少通过一种方法检测为阳性。调查中发现了七种具有不同传播模式(主要是水平传播或垂直传播)的沙门氏菌血清型。结果表明,袜子采样法(五双袜子)的灵敏度与手工采集法(60组每组五个粪便样本)相当;纸张采集法较差,仅使用一双袜子的方法也较差。还对不同方法的有效样本池大小进行了估计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验