• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高于正常的语音和噪音水平下对单音节词的识别。

Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

作者信息

Studebaker G A, Sherbecoe R L, McDaniel D M, Gwaltney C A

机构信息

Memphis Speech & Hearing Center, University of Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Apr;105(4):2431-44. doi: 10.1121/1.426848.

DOI:10.1121/1.426848
PMID:10212424
Abstract

The effects of intensity on monosyllabic word recognition were studied in adults with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The stimuli were bandlimited NU#6 word lists presented in quiet and talker-spectrum-matched noise. Speech levels ranged from 64 to 99 dB SPL and S/N ratios from 28 to -4 dB. In quiet, the performance of normal-hearing subjects remained essentially constant in noise, at a fixed S/N ratio, it decreased as a linear function of speech level. Hearing-impaired subjects performed like normal-hearing subjects tested in noise when the data were corrected for the effects of audibility loss. From these and other results, it was concluded that: (1) speech intelligibility in noise decreases when speech levels exceed 69 dB SPL and the S/N ratio remains constant; (2) the effects of speech and noise level are synergistic; (3) the deterioration in intelligibility can be modeled as a relative increase in the effective masking level; (4) normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects are affected similarly by increased signal level when differences in speech audibility are considered; (5) the negative effects of increasing speech and noise levels on speech recognition are similar for all adult subjects, at least up to 80 years; and (6) the effective dynamic range of speech may be larger than the commonly assumed value of 30 dB.

摘要

研究了强度对听力正常以及轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的成年人单音节词识别的影响。刺激材料为在安静环境以及与说话者频谱匹配的噪声中呈现的带限NU#6单词列表。言语水平范围为64至99 dB SPL,信噪比范围为28至 -4 dB。在安静环境中,听力正常的受试者的表现基本保持恒定;在噪声环境中,在固定信噪比下,其表现随着言语水平呈线性下降。当针对可听度损失的影响对数据进行校正后,听力受损受试者的表现与在噪声环境中测试的听力正常受试者相似。从这些以及其他结果得出以下结论:(1) 当言语水平超过69 dB SPL且信噪比保持恒定时,噪声中的言语可懂度会降低;(2) 言语和噪声水平的影响是协同的;(3) 可懂度的下降可被模拟为有效掩蔽水平的相对增加;(4) 当考虑言语可听度差异时,听力正常和听力受损的受试者受到信号水平增加的影响相似;(5) 对于所有成年受试者,至少到80岁,言语和噪声水平增加对言语识别的负面影响是相似的;(6) 言语的有效动态范围可能大于通常假定的30 dB值。

相似文献

1
Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.在高于正常的语音和噪音水平下对单音节词的识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Apr;105(4):2431-44. doi: 10.1121/1.426848.
2
Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.安静和嘈杂环境下单音节词的正常及听力受损者的单词识别分数。
Br J Audiol. 1997 Jun;31(3):153-64. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000018.
3
Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.感音神经性听力损失患者在使用线性和压缩式助听器的未助听和助听条件下的语音识别性能。
Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):280-90. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00003.
4
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.
5
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
6
Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.理解听力受损听众中过度的信噪比损失。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.3.
7
A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.正常听力的听众在语音频谱噪声中对PB - 50、CID W - 22、NU - 6、W - 1双音节词以及由同一说话者说出的单音节数字的识别性能比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):496-506. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.5.
8
Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.语音与噪声空间分离所带来益处的频谱贡献。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec;45(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/104).
9
Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.3430名退伍军人的噪声中言语测试临床经验:与纯音阈值及安静环境下言语识别的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):405-23. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.3.
10
A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).在多说话者嘈杂环境中两项单词识别任务的比较:噪声中的语音识别测试(SPRINT)和噪声中的单词测试(WIN)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;19(7):548-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased listening effort and decreased speech discrimination at high presentation sound levels in acoustic hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.在听力正常的听众和人工耳蜗使用者中,较高的声音呈现水平会增加聆听努力并降低言语辨别能力。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 21:2024.09.20.614145. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.20.614145.
2
Amplitude Compression for Preventing Rollover at Above-Conversational Speech Levels.用于防止在会话以上水平发生翻滚的幅度压缩。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165231224597. doi: 10.1177/23312165231224597.
3
Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults Using Bimodal Hearing Configurations.
成人使用双耳双模听力配置的听力学管理最佳实践指南。
Otol Neurotol Open. 2022 Jun;2(2):e011. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000011. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants.通过助听器听音乐:对人工耳蜗植入的潜在启示。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165211072969. doi: 10.1177/23312165211072969.
5
An intrusive method for estimating speech intelligibility from noisy and distorted signals.一种从噪声和失真信号中估计语音可懂度的侵入式方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Sep;150(3):1762. doi: 10.1121/10.0005899.
6
Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.助听器中的压缩和放大算法会损害神经对语音响应的选择性。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2022 Jun;6(6):717-730. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00707-y. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners.评估人工耳蜗植入者中的自适应动态补偿系统。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520970349. doi: 10.1177/2331216520970349.
8
Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape.比较正常听力和听力障碍听众的语音识别:用于控制语音水平和频谱形状差异的仿真。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):4289-4299. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00246. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.成人人工耳蜗使用者在单词分段中与年龄相关的时间处理缺陷。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519886688. doi: 10.1177/2331216519886688.
10
Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing.听力正常的年轻人对多说话者语音混响中泰米尔单音节和双音节单词的感知
J Audiol Otol. 2019 Oct;23(4):181-186. doi: 10.7874/jao.2018.00465. Epub 2019 Jun 25.