• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下注射硬化疗法联合或不联合同步结扎治疗食管静脉曲张的评估。

Evaluation of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with and without simultaneous ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices.

作者信息

Nishikawa Y, Hosokawa Y, Doi T, Endo H, Tanimizu M, Hyodo I, Jinno K, Sakata T, Tomoda J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Research, National Shikoku Cancer Center Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;34(2):159-62. doi: 10.1007/s005350050237.

DOI:10.1007/s005350050237
PMID:10213112
Abstract

For more effective and simple endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices, we developed an EIS procedure with ligation (EISL) that is non-invasive, in which EIS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) are performed simultaneously. In this study, we compared EISL and EIS in a randomized sample of patients (n = 14 for each procedure). For EISL, EVL was performed, including the injection site, after the injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate with iopamidol (EOI) into a varix. The mean number of treatment sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices was 2.3+/-0.5 for EISL and 3.9+/-0.8 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean number of treatment sites was 6.2+/-2.2 for EISL and 14.0+/-5.0 for EIS (P < 0.001); the mean total amount of EOI used was 13.8+/-5.2ml for EISL and 26.3+/-9.8ml for EIS (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence of varices or in bleeding between the two groups. For EISL, fewer treatment sessions and less sclerosant were sufficient, probably because the sclerosants were more effective due to the blockage of variceal blood flow by the ligation. This method should provide a novel modification of EIS.

摘要

为了使食管静脉曲张的内镜注射硬化疗法(EIS)更有效且更简便,我们开发了一种带有结扎术的EIS程序(EISL),该程序是非侵入性的,其中EIS和内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)同时进行。在本研究中,我们在随机抽取的患者样本(每种程序各14例)中比较了EISL和EIS。对于EISL,在将5%油酸乙醇胺与碘帕醇(EOI)注入静脉曲张后,对包括注射部位在内进行EVL。消除食管静脉曲张所需的平均治疗次数,EISL为2.3±0.5次,EIS为3.9±0.8次(P<0.001);平均治疗部位数量,EISL为6.2±2.2个,EIS为14.0±5.0个(P<0.001);EOI的平均总用量,EISL为13.8±5.2ml,EIS为26.3±9.8ml(P<0.001)。两组之间静脉曲张复发率或出血率无显著差异。对于EISL,较少的治疗次数和较少的硬化剂就足够了,可能是因为结扎术阻断了静脉曲张血流,使硬化剂更有效。该方法应为EIS提供一种新的改进。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with and without simultaneous ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices.内镜下注射硬化疗法联合或不联合同步结扎治疗食管静脉曲张的评估。
J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;34(2):159-62. doi: 10.1007/s005350050237.
2
Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with ligation versus endoscopic injection sclerotherapy alone in the management of esophageal varices: a prospective randomized trial.内镜下注射硬化剂联合结扎术与单纯内镜下注射硬化剂治疗食管静脉曲张的前瞻性随机试验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 May-Jun;47(33):733-7.
3
A Prospective Study of Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy and Endoscopic Variceal Ligation in the Treatment of Esophageal Varices.内镜注射硬化疗法与内镜下静脉曲张结扎术治疗食管静脉曲张的前瞻性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):333-341. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0436. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
Repeated injection sclerotherapy is preferable to combined therapy with variceal ligation to avoid recurrence of esophageal varices:--a prospective randomized trial.重复注射硬化疗法优于联合套扎治疗食管静脉曲张以避免复发:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Mar-Apr;44(14):467-71.
5
A prospective randomized controlled trial of sclerotherapy vs ligation in the prophylactic treatment of high-risk esophageal varices.硬化疗法与结扎术预防性治疗高危食管静脉曲张的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Jun;13(6):580-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649901045.
6
Novel balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation in the treatment of esophageal varices: a prospective randomized study.新型球囊压迫辅助内镜下注射硬化治疗与内镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术治疗食管静脉曲张:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7839-7847. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09412-6. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
7
Clinical evaluation of combined endoscopic variceal ligation and sclerotherapy of gastric varices in liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者胃静脉曲张内镜下套扎术联合硬化剂注射治疗的临床评估
Endoscopy. 2003 Nov;35(11):940-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-43475.
8
Endoscopic variceal ligation compared with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.内镜下静脉曲张套扎术与内镜下注射硬化剂治疗食管静脉曲张出血的比较:一项荟萃分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2534-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2534.
9
Sclerotherapy plus ligation versus ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices: a prospective randomized study.硬化疗法联合结扎术与单纯结扎术治疗食管静脉曲张的前瞻性随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70336-6.
10
The endoscopic ultrasound probe findings in prediction of esophageal variceal recurrence after endoscopic variceal eradication therapies in cirrhotic patients: a cohort prospective study.内镜超声探头检查结果对肝硬化患者内镜下静脉曲张根除治疗后食管静脉曲张复发的预测价值:一项队列前瞻性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 19;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-0943-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventional radiology using endoscopy: Blood supply route-targeted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy with multiple ligations for giant esophagogastric varices.内镜介入放射学:针对巨大食管胃静脉曲张的血供途径靶向内镜注射硬化疗法联合多重结扎术
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Apr 19;18(6):2282-2288. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.03.037. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.肝硬化食管静脉曲张患者的静脉曲张出血一级预防:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;4(4):CD013121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013121.pub2.
3
Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.
肝硬化失代偿期食管静脉曲张出血患者的二级预防:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 30;3(3):CD013122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013122.pub2.
4
The evolving role of endoscopic treatment for bleeding esophageal varices.内镜治疗在食管静脉曲张出血中不断演变的作用。
World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):966-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0138-2.