Stokes T, Schober P
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Jan;10(1):17-21. doi: 10.1258/0956462991913024.
We set out to determine current policy and practice in relation to contact tracing (partner notification) for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) within genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in England and Wales. A confidential postal questionnaire survey of all GUM clinics in England and Wales was undertaken. Completed questionnaires were returned by 105 GUM clinics (a response rate of 65%). All respondents undertook routine contact tracing for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. The most popular method of contact tracing used was patient referral. The majority of contact tracing was undertaken by health advisers. Information on the time period over which contact tracing was undertaken showed wide variation. Audit data on the effectiveness of contact tracing in terms of the proportion of sexual contacts seen were available from only a minority of GUM clinics (33/79, 42%). Only chlamydia (24/79, 30%) and gonorrhoea (22/79, 28%) were the subject of any appreciable audit activity. There is wide variation in contact tracing policy and practice in GUM clinics in England and Wales. Audit of contact tracing effectiveness appears to be a minority activity. Further research is needed before an evidence-based approach to contact tracing can be implemented.
我们着手确定英格兰和威尔士性传播疾病(STD)在泌尿生殖医学(GUM)诊所内进行接触者追踪(性伴通知)的现行政策和做法。我们对英格兰和威尔士的所有GUM诊所进行了一次保密的邮寄问卷调查。105家GUM诊所返回了填写完整的问卷(回复率为65%)。所有受访者都对淋病和衣原体感染进行常规接触者追踪。最常用的接触者追踪方法是患者转诊。大多数接触者追踪工作由健康顾问完成。关于进行接触者追踪的时间段信息显示差异很大。只有少数GUM诊所(33/79,42%)提供了有关接触者追踪有效性的审计数据,以性伴被诊视的比例来衡量。只有衣原体感染(24/79,30%)和淋病(22/79,28%)有任何可观的审计活动。英格兰和威尔士GUM诊所的接触者追踪政策和做法差异很大。对接触者追踪有效性的审计似乎是少数诊所的活动。在实施基于证据的接触者追踪方法之前,还需要进一步研究。