• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组方法的应用——来自性健康研究的实例

The use of focus group methodology--with selected examples from sexual health research.

作者信息

Robinson N

机构信息

Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Studies, Wolfson Institute of Health Sciences, Thames Valley University, 32-38 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, London W5 2BS, England.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):905-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00966.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00966.x
PMID:10215982
Abstract

This paper describes in detail the use of the focus group approach in research. The following issues are discussed: when, why and how focus group methods are used, their advantages and disadvantages and how data are analysed. Selected examples from four research studies on sexual health using this methodology are reported together with some of the problems experienced with their use. The importance of using focus groups in qualitative research is addressed and an argument is suggested for their more general use.

摘要

本文详细描述了焦点小组方法在研究中的应用。讨论了以下问题:焦点小组方法何时、为何以及如何使用,其优缺点以及如何分析数据。报告了四项使用该方法进行的性健康研究的选定示例以及使用过程中遇到的一些问题。阐述了在定性研究中使用焦点小组的重要性,并提出了更广泛使用焦点小组的理由。

相似文献

1
The use of focus group methodology--with selected examples from sexual health research.焦点小组方法的应用——来自性健康研究的实例
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):905-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00966.x.
2
Qualitative research and focus group methodology.定性研究与焦点小组方法
Orthop Nurs. 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):54-5.
3
[Focus group interviews: a qualitative research approach to nursing].焦点小组访谈:一种用于护理的定性研究方法
Pflege. 2000 Jun;13(3):145-51. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.13.3.145.
4
The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.学习曲线:使用焦点小组作为数据收集方法的优缺点。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217.
5
[Focus groups as a methodological approach to nursing research].[焦点小组作为护理研究的一种方法学途径]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 1999 Jan;20(1):5-25.
6
Risks and protective behaviors of adolescents living with HIV/AIDS in Botswana.博茨瓦纳感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的青少年的风险与保护行为
Health Care Women Int. 2009 Mar;30(3):232. doi: 10.1080/07399330802662069.
7
Patient satisfaction with chronic pain management.患者对慢性疼痛管理的满意度。
Nurs Stand. 2001;15(51):33-8. doi: 10.7748/ns.15.51.33.s59.
8
Use of focus groups with rural women of lower socioeconomic status.对社会经济地位较低的农村妇女使用焦点小组访谈法。
Appl Nurs Res. 1999 Feb;12(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(99)80178-5.
9
Using focus group methodology in nursing.在护理中运用焦点小组方法。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;30(2):62-5; quiz 94-5. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-19990301-06.
10
A peer education program: delivering highly reliable sexual health promotion messages in schools.同伴教育计划:在学校中传递高度可靠的性健康促进信息。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Mar;54(3 Suppl):S70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of Interactions with Healthcare Providers Among Patients Who Are Blind.失明患者与医疗服务提供者互动的视角
J Blind Innov Res. 2021;11(2). doi: 10.5241/11-206.
2
Exploring factors of successful transition to elementary school among children with autism spectrum disorder in Japan: a focus group study.探索日本自闭症谱系障碍儿童成功过渡到小学的因素:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Jun 26;70(2):296-305. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2088222. eCollection 2024.
3
Pragmatic Delphi study aimed at determining practical components for a tool designed to assist Dutch primary care-givers in opioid deprescribing for non-cancer pain.
实用德尔菲研究旨在确定一种工具的实用组成部分,该工具旨在帮助荷兰初级保健提供者减少非癌症疼痛的阿片类药物。
Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):827-843. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad058.
4
Qualitative study of the roles of midwives in the provision of sexual and reproductive healthcare services in the Somaliland health system.对索马里兰卫生系统中助产士在提供性健康和生殖健康服务方面的作用进行定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e067315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067315.
5
The Sexual and Reproductive Health of Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy in Rural Bangladesh: A Qualitative Analysis.孟加拉国农村地区脑瘫青少年的性与生殖健康:定性分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1689-1700. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02535-4. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Girl child marriage and the social context of displacement: a qualitative comparative exploration of Syrian refugees in Jordan and Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh.女孩童婚与流离失所的社会背景:对约旦叙利亚难民和孟加拉国罗兴亚难民的定性比较探索。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):2417. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14832-z.
7
Back to the Roots of Nursing: Qualitative Study on the Experience of Nurses in the Front Line During the COVID-19 Pandemic.回归护理根源:关于新冠疫情期间一线护士经历的质性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 9;9:903517. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.903517. eCollection 2022.
8
The Impact of Health and Social Services on the Quality of Life in Families of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Focus Group Study.健康与社会服务对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)成年患者家庭生活质量的影响:一项焦点小组研究
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 28;12(2):177. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020177.
9
Mental health and challenges of transgender women: A qualitative study in Brazil and India.跨性别女性的心理健康与挑战:巴西和印度的一项定性研究
Int J Transgend Health. 2020 Jun 2;21(4):418-430. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1761923. eCollection 2020.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of a community pharmacy referral service for suspected lung cancer symptoms.社区药店转介服务对疑似肺癌症状的可行性和可接受性。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Aug;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000772.