Ottem E
National Centre for Logopedics, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Psychol. 1999 Mar;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00092.
The present paper is an analysis of the WISC-R test profiles of reading impaired subjects and autistic subjects. It is argued that well-known classification systems such as Bannatyne's categories (1974) and Kaufman's factors (1975) cannot explain differences in the peaks and troughs across the two populations. A new classification system is then developed. The 11 different WISC-R subtests are characterised in terms of a combination of three modes of cognitive functioning: a knowledge mode (declarative-procedural), a processing mode (transformation-preservation of information), and a verbal-nonverbal mode (verbal-nonverbal-processing). When reanalysed within this reference frame, the IQ profiles of reading impaired subjects (N = 114) and autistic subjects (data from 12 studies reviewed by Happé, 1994) were similar regarding differences in the verbal-nonverbal dimension. However, the IQ profiles showed an opposite pattern in the declarative-procedural dimension, and an opposite pattern in the preservation-transformation dimension. Thus, the new classification system allows one to interpret the IQ-profiles of both groups within a single and coherent reference frame.
本文是对阅读障碍受试者和自闭症受试者韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)测试剖面图的分析。文中指出,诸如班纳坦分类法(1974年)和考夫曼因素分析法(1975年)等知名分类系统无法解释这两类人群在剖面图峰谷方面的差异。随后开发了一种新的分类系统。韦氏儿童智力量表修订版的11个不同分测验依据三种认知功能模式的组合来进行描述:知识模式(陈述性-程序性)、加工模式(信息转换-保存)以及言语-非言语模式(言语-非言语-加工)。在此参照框架内重新分析时,阅读障碍受试者(N = 114)和自闭症受试者(数据来自哈佩1994年综述的12项研究)在言语-非言语维度上的差异方面,智商剖面图是相似的。然而,智商剖面图在陈述性-程序性维度上呈现出相反的模式,在保存-转换维度上也呈现出相反的模式。因此,新的分类系统使人们能够在一个统一且连贯的参照框架内解读两组受试者的智商剖面图。