• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning.

作者信息

Crowley K, Siegler R S

机构信息

Learning Research & Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. crowleyk+@pitt.edu

出版信息

Child Dev. 1999 Mar-Apr;70(2):304-16. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00023.

DOI:10.1111/1467-8624.00023
PMID:10218256
Abstract

Children often learn new problem-solving strategies by observing examples of other people's problem-solving. When children learn a new strategy through observation and also explain the new strategy to themselves, they generalize the strategy more widely than children who learn a new strategy but do not explain. We tested three hypothesized mechanisms through which explanations might facilitate strategy generalization: more accurate recall of the new strategy's procedures; increased selection of the new strategy over competing strategies; or more effective management of the new strategy's goal structure. Findings supported the third mechanism: Explanations facilitated generalization through the creation of novel goal structures that enabled children to persist in use of the new strategy despite potential interference from competing strategies. The facilitative effect of explanation did vary with children's age and did not vary between explanations children created by themselves versus explanations they learned from the experimenter.

摘要

相似文献

1
Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning.
Child Dev. 1999 Mar-Apr;70(2):304-16. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00023.
2
Inhibiting intuition: Scaffolding children's theory construction about species evolution in the face of competing explanations.抑制直觉:在面对竞争解释时,为儿童构建物种进化理论提供支持。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104635. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104635. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Reasoning in middle childhood: a dynamic model of performance on transitivity tasks.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1994 Oct;58(2):252-88. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1994.1035.
4
The medium can obscure the message: young children's understanding of video.媒介可能会模糊信息:幼儿对视频的理解。
Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):950-65.
5
What leads children to adopt new strategies? A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of class inclusion.是什么促使儿童采用新策略?类包含的微观发生/横断面研究。
Child Dev. 2006 Jul-Aug;77(4):997-1015. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00915.x.
6
Using data to solve problems: Children reason flexibly in response to different kinds of evidence.运用数据解决问题:儿童能灵活推理,对不同类型的证据做出反应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:172-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
Young children's analogical problem solving: gaining insights from video displays.幼儿类比问题解决能力:从视频展示中获得的启示。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Dec;116(4):904-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
8
Strategy utilization deficiencies in children: when, where, and why.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1994;25:107-56. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60051-8.
9
How children change their minds: strategy change can be gradual or abrupt.儿童如何改变他们的想法:策略改变可以是渐进的或突然的。
Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):127-45. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.1.127.
10
Occam's rattle: children's use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference.奥卡姆剃刀:儿童运用简单性和概率来约束推理。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Jul;48(4):1156-64. doi: 10.1037/a0026471. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding Scientific Explanations Into Storybooks Impacts Children's Scientific Discourse and Learning.将科学解释融入故事书会影响儿童的科学话语和学习。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01016. eCollection 2020.
2
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
3
Explain This, Explore That: A Study of Parent-Child Interaction in a Children's Museum.《解释这,探索那:儿童博物馆中的亲子互动研究》。
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):e598-e617. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13232. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts.因果学习具有协作性:考察社会情境中的解释和探索。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1548-1554. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1351-3.
5
Generating explanations via analogical comparison.通过类比比较生成解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1364-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1289-5.
6
Explanation can cause Forgetting: Memory Dynamics in the Generation of New Arguments.解释会导致遗忘:新论点生成中的记忆动态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1426-1435. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1283-y.
7
Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning.启发式解释:自我解释何时有助于学习的约束条件。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1501-1510. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5.
8
Examining explanatory biases in young children's biological reasoning.探究幼儿生物学推理中的解释性偏差。
J Cogn Dev. 2014;15(2):284-303. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.749480.
9
Development of intuitive rules: evaluating the application of the dual-system framework to understanding children's intuitive reasoning.直觉规则的发展:评估双系统框架在理解儿童直觉推理中的应用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):935-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03213907.