• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《贝利婴儿发展量表》第二部分:从何处入手?

The Bayley Scales of Infant Development. II: Where to start?

作者信息

Gauthier S M, Bauer C R, Messinger D S, Closius J M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33101, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1999 Apr;20(2):75-9. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199904000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00004703-199904000-00001
PMID:10219684
Abstract

This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment. The Bayley II was administered to 78 12-month-old infants by certified examiners beginning with the 12-month age item set. A second certified examiner then administered 10 additional items that completed the 11-month and 13-month age item sets. Of the 78 infants tested, 73 (94%) met basal and ceiling criteria in all three item sets. Three separate Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores were calculated using 12-month norms for each subject, which were based on the raw scores generated from the 11-, 12-, and 13-month age item sets. Scores calculated on the 11-month set were significantly lower than those on the 12-month set, which were in turn significantly lower than those on the 13-month set. When tested on the 11-month instead of on the 12-month item set, twice as many infants received lower than normal (< 85) MDI scores, indicating an impact on referability decisions. Minor adjustments in administration of the Bayley II, such as those based on assumptions regarding an infant's current level of functioning, significantly affect infant test scores and eligibility for follow-up services. Standardized use of this test should minimize variability in test scores.

摘要

本研究探讨了贝利婴儿发展量表第二版(贝利-II)的心理量表分数是否会因将哪一组项目作为婴儿评估起点而有所不同。认证考官从12个月龄项目组开始,对78名12个月大的婴儿进行了贝利-II测试。随后,另一位认证考官又施测了10个额外项目,从而完成了11个月龄和13个月龄项目组的测试。在接受测试的78名婴儿中,73名(94%)在所有三个项目组中均达到了基础和上限标准。使用每个受试者基于11个月龄、12个月龄和13个月龄项目组原始分数得出的12个月龄常模,分别计算出三个独立的心理发展指数(MDI)分数。基于11个月龄项目组计算出的分数显著低于基于12个月龄项目组计算出的分数,而基于12个月龄项目组计算出的分数又显著低于基于13个月龄项目组计算出的分数。当以11个月龄而非12个月龄项目组进行测试时,获得低于正常(<85)MDI分数的婴儿数量增加了一倍,这表明对可参考性决策有影响。贝利-II施测过程中的微小调整,例如基于对婴儿当前功能水平的假设所做的调整,会显著影响婴儿测试分数以及获得后续服务的资格。该测试的标准化使用应尽量减少测试分数的变异性。

相似文献

1
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development. II: Where to start?《贝利婴儿发展量表》第二部分:从何处入手?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1999 Apr;20(2):75-9. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199904000-00001.
2
Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III Cognitive Scale: are we measuring the same thing?贝利第二心理发育指数与贝利第三认知量表的比较:我们测量的是同一件事吗?
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Feb;101(2):e55-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02517.x. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
3
A population-based study to determine the performance of the Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale to Predict the Mental Developmental Index at 18 Months on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II in very preterm infants.一项基于人群的研究,旨在确定认知适应性测试/临床语言和听觉里程碑量表在预测极早产儿18个月时贝利婴儿发展量表第二版心理发展指数方面的表现。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e864-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0447. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
4
Predictive value of the Bayley scales of infant development on development of very preterm/very low birth weight children: a meta-analysis.贝利婴幼儿发展量表对极早产儿/极低出生体重儿发育的预测价值:一项荟萃分析。
Early Hum Dev. 2013 Jul;89(7):487-96. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
5
Test-retest and home-clinic characteristics of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development in nine- and fifteen-month-old infants.9个月和15个月大婴儿的贝利婴儿发展量表的重测及家庭-诊所特征
Child Dev. 1980 Sep;51(3):751-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1980.tb02610.x.
6
Stability of the Bayley II Scales of Infant Development in a sample of low-risk and high-risk infants.贝利婴幼儿发展量表第二版在低风险和高风险婴儿样本中的稳定性。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Dec;47(12):820-3. doi: 10.1017/S0012162205001738.
7
Stability of the mental and motor Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.) in infants over first three years of life.贝利婴幼儿发展量表(第二版)心理与运动部分在婴儿出生后前三年的稳定性。
Przegl Epidemiol. 2013;67(3):483-6, 581-4.
8
Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age.贝利婴儿发育量表对极低出生体重儿童学龄期认知功能的预测效度不佳。
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):333-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0173.
9
Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-month-old infants.贝利婴儿发展量表第二版(BSID-II)运动量表与皮博迪发育运动量表第二版(PDMS-2)在12个月大婴儿中的同时效度。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006 Fall;18(3):190-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000226746.57895.57.
10
Chronic physiologic instability is associated with neurodevelopmental morbidity at one and two years in extremely premature infants.慢性生理不稳定与极早产儿1岁和2岁时的神经发育疾病相关。
Pediatrics. 1998 Sep;102(3):E35. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.e35.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of prenatal exposure to opioids on early childhood development: context matters most.产前接触阿片类药物对幼儿发育的影响:环境最为重要。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2024 Jun;25(8):1083-1094. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2365331. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
2
No relationship between mode of delivery and neonatal mortality and neurodevelopment in very low birth weight infants aged two years.出生方式与两岁极低出生体重儿的新生儿死亡率及神经发育之间无关联。
World J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;10(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s12519-014-0497-6. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
The results of early physiotherapy on a child with incontinentia pigmenti with encephalocele.
早期物理治疗对一名患有色素失禁症合并脑膨出儿童的效果。
BMJ Case Rep. 2010 Aug 5;2010:bcr0320102814. doi: 10.1136/bcr.03.2010.2814.
4
Low Motor Assessment: A Comparative Pilot Study with Young Children With and Without Motor Impairment.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2010 Feb;22(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s10882-009-9165-5. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
5
A review of the effects of sleep during the first year of life on cognitive, psychomotor, and temperament development.综述生命第一年的睡眠对认知、心理运动和气质发展的影响。
Sleep. 2009 Nov;32(11):1449-58. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.11.1449.