Suppr超能文献

Clinical decision making: recognition of confusion and application of restraints.

作者信息

Ludwick R

机构信息

School of Nursing at Kent State University, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Orthop Nurs. 1999 Jan-Feb;18(1):65-72.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the effects of patients' social, behavioral and medical characteristics on nurses' clinical decision for patient confusion.

DESIGN

Factorial survey.

METHODS

A random sample of 100 registered nurses scored 30 unique situation based vignettes on the likelihood the patient described was confused and whether restraints should be used. Every vignette contained a combination of eight independent patient variables: age; gender; race; patient affect; type, seriousness and time of patient act and medical diagnosis.

FINDINGS

Examination of the recognition model and the intervention (applying restraints) models showed that patient variables explained approximately 40% and 43% of the variance respectively. Type of act, seriousness of act, time of act, and patient age all significantly increased nurses identifying patients as confused. The variables that were strong predictors for recognizing confusion were strong predictors for restraint use except that patients who exhibited a negative affect were more likely to be restrained than patients' who were portrayed as pleasant.

CONCLUSION

Confusion is a complex clinical phenomenon with many dimensions. Confusion tools should be standardized and routinely used.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验