Nagaoka H, Hirooka K, Ohnuki M, Fujiwara N
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 Mar;8(2):124-30.
In order to achieve better operative results, myocardial protection for cardiac valve re-replacement must be further improved. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous warm blood cardioplegia (CWBC) with that of intermittent cold potassium cardioplegia (ICPC) in cardiac valve re-replacement.
A total of 49 consecutive patients underwent elective cardiac valve re-replacement via sternal re-entry; 27 patients received CWBC and 22 ICPC. During surgery, a narrower dissection of the heart was used in the CWBC group. The myocardial protective effects and operative outcome were analyzed in the two groups.
Two ICPC patients died in hospital, one from cerebral bleeding and one from low output syndrome. The rate of spontaneous recovery of the heart-beat after aortic declamping was significantly higher in CWBC patients than in the ICPC group (92.3% versus 13.6%, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, maximum serum creatine kinase-MB levels were significantly lower in CWBC patients than in ICPC patients (25.5 +/- 6.0 versus 81.1 +/- 26.0 IU/l, p < 0.02). Left ventricular stroke work index in the CWBC group showed significantly better recovery in the early postoperative period compared with that in the ICPC group. Extraction of myocardial oxygen (range: 0.33 to 0.35) and lactate (range: -0.02 to 0.14) in CWBC patients was maintained within the normal range immediately after aortic declamping and in the early postoperative period. In contrast, in ICPC patients extraction of myocardial oxygen (range: 0.18 to 0.23) and lactate (range: -0.27 to -0.17) was impaired during the same period. Postoperative (24-h) blood loss was significantly less in CWBC patients than in ICPC patients (p < 0.02).
In cardiac valve re-replacement surgery through sternal re-entry, and without wide exposure of the heart, continuous warm blood cardioplegia provides much greater myocardial protection than does intermittent cold potassium cardioplegia.
为了获得更好的手术效果,心脏瓣膜再次置换术中心肌保护措施必须进一步改进。本研究旨在比较持续温血心脏停搏液(CWBC)和间断冷钾心脏停搏液(ICPC)在心脏瓣膜再次置换术中的效果。
49例连续患者经胸骨再次切开行择期心脏瓣膜再次置换术;27例患者接受CWBC,22例接受ICPC。手术过程中,CWBC组心脏分离范围更窄。分析两组的心肌保护效果和手术结果。
2例ICPC患者住院死亡,1例死于脑出血,1例死于低心排综合征。主动脉阻断后心脏自动复跳率CWBC组显著高于ICPC组(92.3%对13.6%,p<0.001)。术后,CWBC组患者血清肌酸激酶-MB最高水平显著低于ICPC组患者(25.5±6.0对81.1±26.0IU/l,p<0.02)。与ICPC组相比,CWBC组左心室每搏功指数术后早期恢复明显更好。CWBC组患者主动脉阻断后即刻及术后早期心肌氧摄取率(范围:0.33至0.35)和乳酸摄取率(范围:-0.02至0.14)维持在正常范围内。相比之下,ICPC组患者同期心肌氧摄取率(范围:0.18至0.23)和乳酸摄取率(范围:-0.27至-0.17)受损。CWBC组患者术后(24小时)失血量显著少于ICPC组患者(p<0.02)。
在经胸骨再次切开且不广泛暴露心脏的心脏瓣膜再次置换手术中,持续温血心脏停搏液比间断冷钾心脏停搏液提供更好的心肌保护。