Hadley P C, Billington R W, Pearson G J
Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Biomaterials. 1999 May;20(9):891-7. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00246-4.
The study aims to directly measure uptake of Na and F ions by glass ionomer cement from dilute NaF solution and compare this with the subsequent re-release of these ions into water. In addition, the effect of the presence or absence of Na and/or F as a component of the glass is evaluated.
The four glass ionomers used differed only in glass composition; AH2 contained both Na and F, LG26 contained F, MP4 contained Na and LG30 contained neither Na nor F. Discs of cement were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h and matured in water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. Test discs were immersed in 0.2% NaF solution for 24 h, control discs in water. Discs were subsequently immersed in water which was changed regularly. Ion-selective electrode measurements (F and Na) and atomic absorption spectrometry (Na) were used to determine uptake (change in immersion solution concentration) and re-release into water.
All cements took up large quantities of Na and F ions (range 95-336 mumol g-1). This resulted in internal ion concentrations from 16 to 56 times higher than the immersing solution. All re-release was complete within 97 days. No cement re-released more ion than taken up. Glass ionomers containing fluoride took up more Na and F than fluoride-free ones and then re-released a lower percentage of these ions. The cements all took up Na and F ions in equimolar proportions, but initially re-released more F than Na with F-free cement results tending to unity by 97 days.
Glass ionomer cements take up Na and F ions from NaF solution in large quantities and in equimolar proportion. This is re-released either wholly or in part in 97 days by which time the release does not differ from the controls. The presence or absence of F in the cement composition markedly influences both uptake and re-release. Fluoride/hydroxyl interchange does not appear to play an important role in uptake.
本研究旨在直接测量玻璃离子水门汀从稀氟化钠溶液中摄取钠和氟离子的情况,并将其与随后这些离子再释放到水中的情况进行比较。此外,还评估了玻璃中是否存在钠和/或氟作为成分的影响。
所使用的四种玻璃离子水门汀仅在玻璃成分上有所不同;AH2同时含有钠和氟,LG26含有氟,MP4含有钠,LG30既不含有钠也不含有氟。将水门汀圆盘在37℃的模具中放置1小时,并在37℃的水中熟化3天。测试圆盘浸泡在0.2%的氟化钠溶液中24小时,对照圆盘浸泡在水中。随后将圆盘浸泡在定期更换的水中。使用离子选择性电极测量(氟和钠)和原子吸收光谱法(钠)来确定摄取量(浸泡溶液浓度的变化)和再释放到水中的情况。
所有水门汀都摄取了大量的钠和氟离子(范围为95 - 336 μmol g⁻¹)。这导致内部离子浓度比浸泡溶液高16至56倍。所有再释放在97天内完成。没有一种水门汀再释放的离子比摄取的多。含氟的玻璃离子水门汀比不含氟的摄取更多的钠和氟,然后再释放这些离子的百分比更低。所有水门汀以等摩尔比例摄取钠和氟离子,但最初再释放的氟比钠多,不含氟的水门汀结果到97天时趋于一致。
玻璃离子水门汀从氟化钠溶液中大量且以等摩尔比例摄取钠和氟离子。这些离子在97天内全部或部分再释放,此时释放情况与对照无差异。水门汀成分中氟的存在与否显著影响摄取和再释放。氟/羟基交换在摄取过程中似乎不起重要作用。