Zuccarello M, Boccaletti R, Rapoport R M
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH 45267-0575, USA.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999 May;33(5):679-84. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199905000-00001.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether endothelin (ET)-1 activation of ETB1 receptors influences the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated ET-1 constriction in the rabbit basilar artery. Initial challenge of ET-1-constricted vessels with BQ610, an ETA-receptor antagonist, resulted in approximately 60% relaxation, and subsequent addition of BQ788, an ETB1/2-receptor antagonist, relaxed the remaining constriction. To test whether blockade of ETB1 receptors influenced the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, ET-1-constricted vessels were exposed to RES-701-1, an ETB1-receptor antagonist, before challenge with BQ610 or BQ788. RES-701-1 enhanced the ET-1 constriction by approximately 60%, consistent with blockade of ETB1 receptor-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation. In ET-1-constricted vessels treated with RES-701-1, BQ610 challenge resulted in complete relaxation, whereas BQ788 was without effect. However, when 10 nM acetylcholine was added to RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels, (a) BQ610 challenge resulted in only approximately 30% relaxation, and subsequent BQ788 addition relaxed the remaining constriction; and (b) BQ788 challenge resulted in approximately 35% relaxation, and subsequent BQ610 addition relaxed the remaining constriction. Acetylcholine induced approximately 10% relaxation of RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels. It is speculated that a dynamic relation exists between ETA and ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, such that ET-1-induced ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction of the basilar artery is dependent on ETB1 receptor activation and, in the absence of this activation, the constriction reverts to completely ETA receptor mediated.
本研究的目的是调查内皮素(ET)-1对ETB1受体的激活是否会影响兔基底动脉中ETA/ETB2受体介导的ET-1收缩的相对强度。用ETA受体拮抗剂BQ610对ET-1收缩的血管进行初始激发,导致约60%的舒张,随后添加ETB1/2受体拮抗剂BQ788,使剩余的收缩舒张。为了测试阻断ETB1受体是否会影响ETA/ETB2受体介导的收缩的相对强度,在用BQ610或BQ788激发之前,将ET-1收缩的血管暴露于ETB1受体拮抗剂RES-701-1。RES-701-1使ET-1收缩增强约60%,这与阻断ETB1受体介导的内皮依赖性舒张一致。在用RES-701-1处理的ET-1收缩血管中,BQ610激发导致完全舒张,而BQ788则无效。然而,当向用RES-701-1处理的ET-1收缩血管中添加10 nM乙酰胆碱时,(a)BQ610激发仅导致约30%的舒张,随后添加BQ788使剩余的收缩舒张;(b)BQ788激发导致约35%的舒张,随后添加BQ610使剩余的收缩舒张。乙酰胆碱使RES-701-1处理的ET-1收缩血管舒张约10%。据推测,ETA和ETB2受体介导的收缩之间存在动态关系,使得ET-1诱导的基底动脉ETB2受体介导的收缩依赖于ETB1受体激活,并且在没有这种激活的情况下,收缩完全转变为ETA受体介导。