Morris K T, Horvath K D, Jobe B A, Swanstrom L L
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, and Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Legacy Health System, 501 North Graham, Suite 210, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):520-2. doi: 10.1007/s004649901026.
A disparity exists between the incidence of accessory spleens reported in the open (15-30%) versus the laparoscopic (0-12%) literature. This disparity implies that a percentage of laparoscopic patients will require a reoperation for accessory splenectomy. We present our experience with the laparoscopic management of accessory spleens discovered after primary splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).
Seventeen patients who underwent primary splenectomy for ITP were reviewed (1 open, 16 laparoscopic). In the laparoscopic group, the incidence of accessory spleens was 3 in 16 (19%). In 1 of these 3 patients, the accessory spleen was found and removed at the initial operation, whereas in 2 of the 16 patients (13%), the accessory spleens were missed. A third patient, whose initial operation was open, presented with recurrent thrombocytopenia after primary splenectomy. After recurrent thrombocytopenia developed, radio nuclide spleen scans were performed showing accessory spleens in all three patients. These three patients underwent accessory splenectomy using a four-port laparoscopic approach.
Laparoscopic accessory splenectomy was successfully performed in all three patients. Location of accessory spleens correlated with the spleen scan in each case. Mean operation time was 180 min. There were no conversions to open surgery and no complications. All patients were discharged from the hospital on postoperation day 1. The three patients had a good clinical response and were weaned effectively from their steroid medications.
Patients undergoing a laparoscopic splenectomy for chronic ITP have a higher probability of requiring a reoperation for a missed accessory spleen. To minimize missing an accessory spleen, a systematic search should be made at the beginning of the laparoscopic operation. We have found that preoperation imaging with heat-treated erythrocyte scans is valuable for locating accessory spleens before reoperation. When reoperation for accessory splenectomy is necessary, a laparoscopic approach is safe and effective.
开放性手术(15%-30%)与腹腔镜手术(0%-12%)文献报道的副脾发生率存在差异。这种差异意味着一定比例的腹腔镜手术患者需要再次手术行副脾切除术。我们介绍了对因特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)行初次脾切除术后发现的副脾进行腹腔镜处理的经验。
回顾了17例因ITP行初次脾切除的患者(1例开放性手术,16例腹腔镜手术)。在腹腔镜组中,16例中有3例(19%)发现副脾。这3例患者中有1例在初次手术时发现并切除了副脾,而16例患者中有2例(13%)副脾被遗漏。第3例患者初次手术为开放性手术,初次脾切除术后出现血小板减少复发。血小板减少复发后,进行放射性核素脾扫描,结果显示所有3例患者均有副脾。这3例患者采用四孔腹腔镜入路行副脾切除术。
所有3例患者均成功进行了腹腔镜副脾切除术。每例副脾的位置与脾扫描结果相符。平均手术时间为180分钟。无中转开腹手术,无并发症。所有患者均于术后第1天出院。3例患者临床反应良好,均成功停用类固醇药物。
因慢性ITP行腹腔镜脾切除术的患者因遗漏副脾而需要再次手术的可能性更高。为尽量减少遗漏副脾,在腹腔镜手术开始时应进行系统探查。我们发现术前用热变性红细胞扫描成像对于再次手术前定位副脾很有价值。当有必要再次手术行副脾切除术时,腹腔镜入路安全有效。