Brugler L, DiPrinzio M J, Bernstein L
St Francis Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Apr;25(4):191-206. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30438-2.
Studies suggest that 30%-55% of hospitalized patients are at risk for malnutrition, an avoidable comorbidity contributing to increases in hospitalization and readmission, length of stay, complications, and mortality. Yet a variety of issues have impeded many hospitals' implementation of effective nutrition intervention programs. BENCHMARKING STUDY: St Francis Hospital (SFH), a 395-bed community acute care facility in Wilmington, Delaware, participated in a nationwide benchmark study in fall 1993. In comparison with the 12-hospital means, data for SFH showed both delays in initiating a nutrition care plan for acutely ill patients and a significantly higher risk for malnutrition. NUTRITION SCREENING PILOT: A pilot study was implemented in 1994 to identify nutrition needs within 48 hours of admission as a first step in the improvement process. Although interventions occurred earlier for a greater number of high-risk patients, nutrition intervention was not being provided in a uniform and timely manner. THE MALNUTRITION CLINICAL PATHWAY: A free-standing hospital committee, the Nutrition Care Committee (NCC), with guidance from the care management department, began developing a malnutrition pathway that would serve as an integrated plan for providing nutrition care to high-risk patients. The original pathway was organized into four stages that outlined the progression and timing of care--identification of the patient at high risk for malnutrition, nutrition care decisions, treatment in progress (the remainder of the patient's hospitalization), and discharge planning. OUTCOME STUDIES: Outcome studies were conducted in 1996 and again in 1998 to assess the malnutrition treatment pathway's impact on patient health outcomes and the cost of care. The 1996 outcome study indicated significant improvements in the identification of high-risk patients (from 25.9% to 86%) and the timeliness of nutrition intervention (from 6.9 days to 2.4 days). A second outcome study was conducted in 1998, following revision of the pathway. Comparison of the 1996 after-pathway patient population with a matched study group in 1998 indicated reductions in average length of stay from 10.8 to 8.1 days; the incidence of major complications from 75.3% to 17.5%; and 30-day readmission rates from 16.5% to 7.1%.
The performance improvement project described in this article began with SHF's voluntary participation in an interdisciplinary benchmarking study and continued when it was apparent that SFH had an opportunity for performance improvement. Forming an NCC at SFH was the first step in a process that gained the administrative support necessary to fully develop the program.
SFH has developed and implemented a malnutrition treatment program that is integrated into the care plan of all acute care patients and is included in the discharge planning process. Outcome studies have demonstrated the effect of the malnutrition treatment program on patient recovery and cost of care.
研究表明,30% - 55%的住院患者存在营养不良风险,这是一种可避免的合并症,会导致住院率和再入院率上升、住院时间延长、并发症增加以及死亡率上升。然而,各种问题阻碍了许多医院实施有效的营养干预计划。
圣弗朗西斯医院(SFH)是特拉华州威尔明顿一家拥有395张床位的社区急症护理机构,于1993年秋季参与了一项全国性的基准研究。与12家医院的平均数据相比,SFH的数据显示,为急症患者启动营养护理计划存在延迟,且营养不良风险显著更高。
1994年开展了一项试点研究,以在入院48小时内确定营养需求,作为改进过程的第一步。尽管对更多高危患者的干预更早进行,但营养干预并未以统一和及时的方式提供。
一个独立的医院委员会,即营养护理委员会(NCC),在护理管理部门的指导下,开始制定一条营养不良路径,作为为高危患者提供营养护理的综合计划。最初的路径分为四个阶段,概述了护理的进展和时间安排——确定营养不良高危患者、营养护理决策、治疗进行中(患者住院的剩余时间)以及出院计划。
1996年和1998年再次进行了结果研究,以评估营养不良治疗路径对患者健康结果和护理成本的影响。1996年的结果研究表明,高危患者的识别有显著改善(从25.9%提高到86%),营养干预的及时性也有显著提高(从6.9天缩短到2.4天)。1998年在路径修订后进行了第二次结果研究。将1996年路径实施后的患者群体与1998年匹配的研究组进行比较,结果显示平均住院时间从10.8天缩短到8.1天;主要并发症的发生率从75.3%降至17.5%;30天再入院率从16.5%降至7.1%。
本文所述的绩效改进项目始于SHF自愿参与一项跨学科基准研究,当明显看出SFH有绩效改进的机会时,该项目继续推进。在SFH成立NCC是该过程的第一步,这获得了全面开展该项目所需的行政支持。
SFH已制定并实施了一项营养不良治疗计划,该计划已纳入所有急症护理患者的护理计划,并包含在出院计划过程中。结果研究证明了营养不良治疗计划对患者康复和护理成本的影响。