Goodman G, Hull J W, Clarkin J F, Yeomans F E
Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical College.
J Pers Disord. 1999 Spring;13(1):35-46. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.1.35.
Structured clinical interviews of 107 female inpatients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) were used to determine whether antisocial personality disorder (APD) diagnostic criteria evident prior to age 15 could be used to predict current Axis I and Axis II psychopathology. Diagnostic information was gathered using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R-Patient Version (SCID-P). Childhood APD criteria were subjected to principal-components analysis, and three factors--rule-breaking, assault, and sadism--emerged. The severity of the childhood APD criteria was related to psychotic symptoms, as well as to the unstable relationships and labile affect BPD criteria and the current overall severity of BPD criteria. Sadism predicted psychotic symptoms and BPD severity, while rule-breaking predicted unstable relationships and BPD severity. Childhood APD severity also had a larger effect on BPD severity than on psychotic symptoms. Possible explanations for these findings are explored and discussed.
对107名被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的女性住院患者进行了结构化临床访谈,以确定15岁之前明显的反社会人格障碍(APD)诊断标准是否可用于预测当前的轴I和轴II精神病理学。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本-患者版结构化临床访谈(SCID-P)收集诊断信息。对儿童期APD标准进行主成分分析,出现了三个因素——违反规则、攻击和施虐。儿童期APD标准的严重程度与精神病症状、不稳定的人际关系和边缘型人格障碍标准中易变的情感以及当前边缘型人格障碍标准的总体严重程度有关。施虐预测精神病症状和边缘型人格障碍严重程度,而违反规则预测不稳定的人际关系和边缘型人格障碍严重程度。儿童期APD严重程度对边缘型人格障碍严重程度的影响也比对精神病症状的影响更大。对这些发现的可能解释进行了探讨和讨论。