Becker Daniel F, Grilo Carlos M, Anez Luis Miguel, Paris Manuel, McGlashan Thomas H
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2005 Mar-Apr;46(2):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.028.
The authors examined the discriminant efficiency of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ( DSM-IV ) criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and antisocial personality disorder (APD). Subjects were 74 men admitted to an outpatient substance abuse program for monolingual Hispanic adults. All were reliably assessed with the Spanish-language version of the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. Conditional probabilities were calculated to determine the diagnostic efficiency and discriminant efficiency of BPD and APD symptoms. Twenty-five (34%) subjects met diagnostic criteria for BPD, and 16 (22%) met criteria for APD. The diagnostic co-occurrence of these disorders was statistically significant. Whereas the diagnostic efficiency of the BPD criterion set was comparable to that reported in other clinical studies, these criteria were not significantly more efficient in diagnosing BPD than APD. By contrast, the APD criteria were more efficient in diagnosing APD than BPD; this was true for both the "adult" and the "conduct disorder" APD criterion subsets. In male Hispanic outpatients with substance use disorders, BPD and APD show significant diagnostic overlap. The APD criteria are useful in discriminating these 2 disorders, whereas the BPD criteria are not. These findings have implications for the discriminant validity of the BPD and APD criteria and support the value of the conduct disorder criteria in predicting APD in adulthood.
作者们考察了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和反社会型人格障碍(APD)的诊断标准的判别效率。研究对象为74名因物质滥用问题而参加门诊治疗项目的单语西班牙裔成年男性。所有研究对象均使用DSM-IV人格障碍诊断访谈的西班牙语版本进行了可靠评估。通过计算条件概率来确定BPD和APD症状的诊断效率和判别效率。25名(34%)研究对象符合BPD的诊断标准,16名(22%)符合APD的诊断标准。这些障碍的诊断共现具有统计学意义。虽然BPD标准集的诊断效率与其他临床研究报告的相当,但这些标准在诊断BPD方面并不比APD更有效。相比之下,APD标准在诊断APD方面比BPD更有效;这在“成人”和“品行障碍”APD标准子集中均成立。在患有物质使用障碍的西班牙裔男性门诊患者中,BPD和APD存在显著的诊断重叠。APD标准有助于区分这两种障碍,而BPD标准则不然。这些发现对BPD和APD标准的判别效度具有启示意义,并支持品行障碍标准在预测成年期APD方面的价值。