• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛肉顾客满意度:烹饪方法和熟度对里脊牛排的影响。

Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top loin steak.

作者信息

Lorenzen C L, Neely T R, Miller R K, Tatum J D, Wise J W, Taylor J F, Buyck M J, Reagan J O, Savell J W

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1999 Mar;77(3):637-44. doi: 10.2527/1999.773637x.

DOI:10.2527/1999.773637x
PMID:10229359
Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the consumer-controlled factors of cooking method and degree of doneness on Top Choice, Low Choice, High Select, and Low Select top loin steaks. The in-home product test was conducted in Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. Consumers (n = 2,212) evaluated each top loin steak for overall like (OLIKE), tenderness (TEND), juiciness (JUIC), flavor desirability (DFLAV), and flavor intensity (IFLAV) using 23-point hedonic scales. Respondents in San Francisco and Philadelphia cooked their top loin steaks to lower degrees of doneness than those in Chicago and Houston. Outdoor grilling was the most common method of cookery for top loin steaks in all cities. Consumers had the highest preference for Top Choice steaks (P < .05) and the lowest preference for Low Select steaks (P < .05). Consumer OLIKE scores were the highest (P < .05) for steaks cooked to a medium rare or lesser degree of doneness. Consumers preferred (P < .05) medium and well done or more degrees of doneness over medium well. The interaction of city x cooking method was significant for all steak palatability attributes. The differences in consumer preparation techniques among cities present challenges for the beef industry to develop market-specific promotional campaigns.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估烹饪方法和熟度这些消费者可控因素对特级精选、低等级精选、高等级特选和低等级特选上腰部牛排的影响。在芝加哥、休斯顿、费城和旧金山进行了家庭产品测试。消费者(n = 2212)使用23分享乐主义量表对每块上腰部牛排的总体喜好度(OLIKE)、嫩度(TEND)、多汁性(JUIC)、风味满意度(DFLAV)和风味强度(IFLAV)进行评估。旧金山和费城的受访者将他们的上腰部牛排烹饪至比芝加哥和休斯顿的受访者更低的熟度。户外烧烤是所有城市中烹饪上腰部牛排最常见的方法。消费者对特级精选牛排的偏好最高(P < .05),对低等级特选牛排的偏好最低(P < .05)。对于烹饪至近三分熟或更低熟度的牛排,消费者的总体喜好度得分最高(P < .05)。与七分熟相比,消费者更喜欢(P < .05)五分熟、全熟或更高熟度。城市与烹饪方法之间的交互作用对所有牛排适口性属性均具有显著影响。城市间消费者烹饪技巧的差异给牛肉行业开展针对特定市场的促销活动带来了挑战。

相似文献

1
Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top loin steak.牛肉顾客满意度:烹饪方法和熟度对里脊牛排的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Mar;77(3):637-44. doi: 10.2527/1999.773637x.
2
Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak.牛肉顾客满意度:烹饪方法和熟度对里脊牛排的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Mar;77(3):645-52. doi: 10.2527/1999.773645x.
3
Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak.牛肉消费者满意度:烹饪方法和熟度对牛外脊牛排的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Mar;77(3):653-60. doi: 10.2527/1999.773653x.
4
Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.牛肉顾客满意度:美国农业部质量等级及腌制对消费者对牛外脊牛排评价的影响
J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):662-70. doi: 10.2527/2005.833662x.
5
Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings.牛肉客户满意度:切块、美国农业部质量等级及城市对家庭消费者评级的影响
J Anim Sci. 1998 Apr;76(4):1027-33. doi: 10.2527/1998.7641027x.
6
Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks.牛肉顾客满意度:影响消费者对牛肩肉排评价的因素。
J Anim Sci. 2002 Feb;80(2):401-8. doi: 10.2527/2002.802401x.
7
Interrelationships of breed type, USDA quality grade, cooking method, and degree of doneness on consumer evaluations of beef in Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, USA.美国得克萨斯州达拉斯市和圣安东尼奥市牛肉品种类型、美国农业部质量等级、烹饪方法和熟度对消费者评价的相互关系
Meat Sci. 2004 Feb;66(2):399-406. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00126-8.
8
Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness.消费者对美国农业部不同质量等级的里脊牛排,在三种熟度下的评价。
J Food Sci. 2015 Feb;80(2):S444-9. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12775. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
9
Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.牛肉客户满意度:训练有素的感官评定小组评分和沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力值。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;81(1):143-9. doi: 10.2527/2003.811143x.
10
Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation.牛肉顾客满意度:在给出烹饪说明时,影响消费者对注射氯化钙的上腰部牛排评价的因素。
J Anim Sci. 2005 Dec;83(12):2869-75. doi: 10.2527/2005.83122869x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study on the Meat Quality, Taste and Aroma Related Compounds between Korean Hanwoo and Chikso Cattle.韩国韩牛与奇克索牛之间肉质、风味及香气相关化合物的比较研究
Foods. 2023 Feb 13;12(4):805. doi: 10.3390/foods12040805.
2
Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.消费者对牛肉、猪肉和羊肉喜好的驱动因素:综述
Foods. 2020 Apr 3;9(4):428. doi: 10.3390/foods9040428.
3
Effects of Doneness on the Microbial, Nutritional, and Quality Properties of Pork Steak of Different Thicknesses.熟度对不同厚度猪排的微生物、营养和品质特性的影响。
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019 Oct;39(5):756-767. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e63. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Evaluation of marbling and enhancement's abilities to compensate for reduced beef palatability at elevated degrees of doneness.评价大理石花纹和嫩度增强对提高牛肉烹饪至较高熟度时适口性的补偿能力。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):669-686. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky435.
5
Mechanical texture profile of Hanwoo muscles as a function of heating temperatures.韩牛肌肉的机械质地剖面随加热温度的变化情况。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 18;60:22. doi: 10.1186/s40781-018-0181-9. eCollection 2018.
6
Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect.牛肉嫩度和肌内脂肪的蛋白质组学生物标志物:肌肉类型的影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 7;6:e4891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4891. eCollection 2018.
7
Meat Quality and Storage Characteristics of Pork Loin Marinated in Grape Pomace.用葡萄皮渣腌制的猪里脊肉的肉质和储存特性
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2017;37(5):726-734. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.5.726. Epub 2017 Oct 31.