Proust F, Callonec F, Clavier E, Lestrat J P, Hannequin D, Thiébot J, Fréger P
Department of Neurosurgery, Rouen University Hospital, France.
Stroke. 1999 May;30(5):1091-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.5.1091.
The noninvasive diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm with the use of conventional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) is based on a velocity study of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The authors report a prospective comparative study between transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS), conventional transcranial Doppler (TCD), and angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm after surgical treatment for aneurysm.
Thirty consecutive patients underwent routine angiography after surgical treatment for intracranial aneurysm. The distribution of vasospasm was determined after a prospective calculation of the angiographic diameter of the MCA, internal carotid artery (ICA), and anterior cerebral artery (ACA). The blood flow velocities (systolic and maximum) of the MCA, ICA, and ACA were evaluated by TCCS and TCD.
The correlation between mean maximum velocity and angiographic diameter was significant for the MCA (r=-0.637, P<0.0001), ICA (r=-0.676, P<0.0001), and ACA (r=-0.425, P<0.01). TCCS sensitivity and specificity were higher than those for TCD for MCA (100% and 93%, respectively) and ICA (100% and 96.6%, respectively). For ACA, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.4% and 84.8%, respectively.
The authors suggest that TCCS is useful for accurate monitoring of cerebral vasospasm in the MCA and ICA. In the ACA, TCCS monitors the hemodynamic state of the anterior part of the circle of Willis, which could expose the patient to a delayed ischemic deficit.
使用传统经颅多普勒超声(TCD)对脑血管痉挛进行无创诊断是基于对大脑中动脉(MCA)的流速研究。作者报告了一项关于经颅彩色编码超声(TCCS)、传统经颅多普勒(TCD)和血管造影术在动脉瘤手术治疗后脑血管痉挛诊断中的前瞻性对比研究。
连续30例患者在颅内动脉瘤手术治疗后接受常规血管造影。在对MCA、颈内动脉(ICA)和大脑前动脉(ACA)的血管造影直径进行前瞻性计算后,确定血管痉挛的分布情况。通过TCCS和TCD评估MCA、ICA和ACA的血流速度(收缩期和最大值)。
MCA(r = -0.637,P < 0.0001)、ICA(r = -0.676,P < 0.0001)和ACA(r = -0.425,P < 0.01)的平均最大流速与血管造影直径之间存在显著相关性。对于MCA(分别为100%和93%)和ICA(分别为100%和96.6%),TCCS的敏感性和特异性高于TCD。对于ACA,敏感性和特异性分别为71.4%和84.8%。
作者认为TCCS有助于准确监测MCA和ICA中的脑血管痉挛。在ACA中,TCCS监测Willis环前部的血流动力学状态,这可能使患者面临延迟性缺血性神经功能缺损。