Ikizler T A, Wingard R L, Harvell J, Shyr Y, Hakim R M
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kidney Int. 1999 May;55(5):1945-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00410.x.
Numerous studies suggest a strong association between nutrition and clinical outcome in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological link between malnutrition and morbidity remains to be clarified. In addition, recent evidence suggests that nutritional indices may reflect an inflammatory response, as well as protein-calorie malnutrition. In this study, we prospectively assessed the relative importance of markers of nutritional status and inflammatory response as determinants of hospitalization in CHD patients.
The study consisted of serial measurements of concentrations of serum albumin, creatinine, transferrin, prealbumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and reactance values by bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) as an indirect measure of lean body mass every 3 months over a period of 15 months in 73 CHD patients. Outcome was determined by hospitalizations over the subsequent three months following each collection of data.
Patients who required hospitalization in the three months following each of the measurement sets had significantly different values for all parameters than patients who were not hospitalized. Thus, serum albumin (3.93 +/- 0.39 vs. 3.74 +/- 0.39 g/dl), serum creatinine (11.0 +/- 3.7 vs. 9.1 +/- 3.5 mg/dl), serum transferrin (181 +/- 35 vs. 170 +/- 34 mg/dl), serum prealbumin (33.6 +/- 9.2 vs. 30.0 +/- 10.1 mg/dl), and reactance (50.4 +/- 15.6 vs. 43.0 +/- 13.0 ohms) were higher for patients not hospitalized, whereas CRP (0.78 +/- 0.89 vs. 2.25 +/- 2.72 mg/dl) was lower in patients who were not hospitalized. All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05 for all parameters). When multivariate analysis was performed, serum CRP and reactance values were the only statistically significant predictors of hospitalization (P < 0.05 for both). When a serum CRP concentration of 0.12 mg/dl was considered as a reference range (relative risk 1.0), the relative risk for hospitalization was 7% higher (relative risk = 1.07) for a CRP concentration of 0.92 mg/dl and was 30% (relative risk = 1.30) higher for a CRP concentration of 3.4 mg/dl. When a reactance value of 70 ohms was considered as a reference range with a relative risk of 1.0, the relative risk of hospitalization increased to 1.09 for a reactance value of 43 ohms and further increased to 1.14 for a reactance value of 31 ohms.
The results of this study strongly indicate that both nutritional status and inflammatory response are independent predictors of hospitalization in CHD patients. CRP and reactance values by BIA are reliable indicators of hospitalization. Visceral proteins such as serum albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin are influenced by inflammation when predicting hospitalization. When short-term clinical outcomes such as hospitalizations are considered, markers of both inflammation and nutrition should be evaluated.
大量研究表明,慢性血液透析(CHD)患者的营养状况与临床结局之间存在密切关联。然而,营养不良与发病率之间的病理生理联系仍有待阐明。此外,最近的证据表明,营养指标可能反映炎症反应以及蛋白质 - 热量营养不良。在本研究中,我们前瞻性地评估了营养状况和炎症反应标志物作为CHD患者住院决定因素的相对重要性。
本研究包括对73例CHD患者在15个月期间每3个月进行一次血清白蛋白、肌酐、转铁蛋白、前白蛋白、C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度的系列测量,以及通过生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测量电抗值,作为瘦体重的间接测量指标。结局通过每次数据收集后接下来三个月内的住院情况来确定。
在每次测量组后的三个月内需要住院的患者,其所有参数的值与未住院患者相比均有显著差异。因此,未住院患者的血清白蛋白(3.93±0.39 vs. 3.74±0.39 g/dl)、血清肌酐(11.0±3.7 vs. 9.1±3.5 mg/dl)、血清转铁蛋白(181±35 vs. 170±34 mg/dl)、血清前白蛋白(33.6±9.2 vs. 30.0±10.1 mg/dl)和电抗(50.4±15.6 vs. 43.0±13.0欧姆)较高,而未住院患者的CRP(0.78±0.89 vs. 2.25±2.72 mg/dl)较低(所有差异均具有统计学意义,所有参数P < 0.05)。进行多变量分析时,血清CRP和电抗值是住院的仅有的具有统计学意义的预测指标(两者P < 0.05)。当将血清CRP浓度0.12 mg/dl视为参考范围(相对风险为(1.0))时,CRP浓度为0.92 mg/dl时住院的相对风险高7%(相对风险 = 1.07),CRP浓度为3.4 mg/dl时住院的相对风险高30%(相对风险 = 1.30)。当将电抗值70欧姆视为参考范围且相对风险为(1.0)时,电抗值为43欧姆时住院的相对风险增加到1.09,电抗值为31欧姆时进一步增加到1.14。
本研究结果强烈表明,营养状况和炎症反应都是CHD患者住院的独立预测因素。CRP和通过BIA测量的电抗值是住院的可靠指标。在预测住院情况时,诸如血清白蛋白、前白蛋白和转铁蛋白等内脏蛋白会受到炎症的影响。当考虑诸如住院等短期临床结局时,应同时评估炎症和营养标志物。