Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Benini R, Bertani T, Zoccali C, Maggiore Q, Salvadori M, Remuzzi G
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Clinical Research Center for Rare Diseases Aldo e Cele Daccò Villa Camozzi, Ranica, Italy.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 May;10(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V105997.
The Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy Core and Follow-Up Study found that > or =36 mo of continued ramipril therapy decreased substantially the risk of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in patients with chronic nephropathies and a urinary protein excretion rate > or =3 g/24 h. This study investigates the time-dependent changes in GFR in these patients and in control subjects who were randomized to conventional therapy during the Core period and switched to ramipril during the Follow-Up study. Analyses included 150 patients (continued ramipril: n = 74; switched to ramipril: n = 76) who had at least three GFR measurements (including baseline) during the whole observation period and a subgroup of 43 patients (continued ramipril: n = 26; switched to ramipril: n = 17) who had at least six GFR measurements, including at least three on the Core and at least three on the Follow-Up study. Ramipril (1.25 to 5 mg/d) and conventional therapy were targeted at achieving a diastolic BP below 90 mm Hg. The main efficacy variables were GFR and ESRF (need for dialysis). Analysis was by intention to treat. Throughout the study, the mean +/- SEM rate of GFR decline (deltaGFR) was significantly lower in patients continued on ramipril compared to those switched to ramipril (0.51+/-0.09 versus 0.76+/-0.10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per mo, P<0.03). In patients on continued ramipril who had at least six GFR measured--but not in control subjects--deltaGFR progressively improved with time and, in the cohort with the longest follow-up, decreased from (in ml/min per 1.73 m2 per mo): 0.16+/-0.12 (at 18 mo) to 0.10+/-0.05 (at 60 mo). This rate was about 10-fold slower compared to patients on conventional therapy during the REIN Core study. Analyses of the individual slopes found that at the end of the follow-up, 10 of 26 patients on continued ramipril therapy had a positive deltaGFR and another 10 patients had an improvement of deltaGFR while on ramipril therapy. DeltaGFR significantly improved in parallel with a significant reduction in proteinuria. Changes in deltaGFR (P = 0.0001) and proteinuria (P = 0.04) were significantly different in the two groups. Baseline characteristics and changes in systolic and diastolic BP and 24-h urine urea and sodium excretion were comparable. The present results offer evidence that in chronic nephropathies, the tendency of GFR to decline with time can be effectively halted, even in patients with remarkably severe disease.
雷米普利治疗肾病核心及随访研究发现,持续雷米普利治疗≥36个月可大幅降低慢性肾病且尿蛋白排泄率≥3g/24小时患者的终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)风险。本研究调查了这些患者以及在核心期随机接受常规治疗并在随访研究期间改用雷米普利的对照受试者中肾小球滤过率(GFR)的时间依赖性变化。分析纳入了150例患者(持续使用雷米普利:n = 74;改用雷米普利:n = 76),这些患者在整个观察期内至少有三次GFR测量值(包括基线值),以及一个43例患者的亚组(持续使用雷米普利:n = 26;改用雷米普利:n = 17),该亚组患者至少有六次GFR测量值,包括在核心期至少三次和在随访研究期至少三次。雷米普利(1.25至5mg/d)和常规治疗的目标是使舒张压低于90mmHg。主要疗效变量为GFR和ESRF(透析需求)。分析采用意向性治疗。在整个研究过程中,持续使用雷米普利的患者GFR下降的平均±标准误速率(ΔGFR)显著低于改用雷米普利的患者(每1.73m²每月0.51±0.09 vs 0.76±0.10ml/min,P<0.03)。在持续使用雷米普利且至少测量了六次GFR的患者中——但对照受试者中未出现这种情况——ΔGFR随时间逐渐改善,在随访时间最长的队列中,从(每1.73m²每月ml/min):0.16±0.12(18个月时)降至0.10±0.05(60个月时)。与REIN核心研究期间接受常规治疗的患者相比,该速率慢约10倍。对个体斜率的分析发现,在随访结束时持续使用雷米普利治疗的26例患者中有10例ΔGFR为正值,另有10例患者在使用雷米普利治疗期间ΔGFR有所改善。ΔGFR的显著改善与蛋白尿的显著减少同时出现。两组中ΔGFR(P = 0.0001)和蛋白尿(P = 0.04)的变化存在显著差异。基线特征以及收缩压和舒张压的变化以及24小时尿尿素和钠排泄量具有可比性。目前的结果提供了证据,表明在慢性肾病中,即使是病情非常严重的患者,GFR随时间下降的趋势也可以有效停止。