van den Ham E C, Kooman J P, Christiaans M H, Nieman F H, Van Kreel B K, Heidendal G A, Van Hooff J P
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 May;10(5):1067-79. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1051067.
Whether multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA), a relatively new method for measuring body composition, is also applicable for accurate body composition measurements in renal transplant (RTx) patients is not known. Therefore, the use of MF-BIA is validated in 77 RTx patients with a stable renal function at least 2 yr posttransplantation. MF-BIA is compared to isotope dilution techniques for measurement of body water compartments, and to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and anthropometry for measurement of fat and fat free mass. Finally, DEXA and anthropometry are compared to each other. Method agreement is assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and plotted by Bland and Altman analysis. MF-BIA significantly underestimates total body water (TBW, 0.7+/-2.1 L) and overestimates the extracellular water (ECW, 3.3+/-1.8 L) compared to isotope dilution; the ICC between both techniques is 0.943 for TBW and 0.846 for ECW. The percentage body fat (BF) measured by MF-BIA is significantly higher than both BF measured by DEXA (3.4+/-4.7%) or by anthropometry (5.5+/-5.2%). The ICC between MF-BIA and DEXA is 0.887 and between MF-BIA and anthropometry 0.856. BF measured by DEXA is significantly higher than BF measured by anthropometry (2.1+/-4.4%); their ICC is 0.913. In conclusion, MF-BIA seems to be suitable for measurement of TBW in RTx patients; however, method agreement between isotope dilution and MF-BIA for the measurement of ECW is not satisfactory. In the assessment of fat and fat free mass, the reliability of MF-BIA appears to be questionable. Method agreement between DEXA and anthropometry seems to be slightly better.
多频生物电阻抗分析(MF-BIA)作为一种相对较新的身体成分测量方法,对于肾移植(RTx)患者是否也适用于准确测量身体成分尚不清楚。因此,本研究在77例移植后至少2年肾功能稳定的RTx患者中验证了MF-BIA的应用。将MF-BIA与用于测量身体水分含量的同位素稀释技术进行比较,并与用于测量脂肪和去脂体重的双能X线吸收法(DEXA)及人体测量法进行比较。最后,将DEXA与人体测量法相互比较。通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估方法一致性,并采用Bland和Altman分析进行绘图。与同位素稀释法相比,MF-BIA显著低估了总体水(TBW,0.7±2.1L),高估了细胞外液(ECW,3.3±1.8L);两种技术之间的ICC,TBW为0.943,ECW为0.846。MF-BIA测量的体脂百分比(BF)显著高于DEXA测量的BF(3.4±4.7%)或人体测量法测量的BF(5.5±5.2%)。MF-BIA与DEXA之间的ICC为0.887,MF-BIA与人体测量法之间的ICC为0.856。DEXA测量的BF显著高于人体测量法测量的BF(2.1±4.4%);它们的ICC为0.913。总之,MF-BIA似乎适用于RTx患者TBW的测量;然而,同位素稀释法与MF-BIA在测量ECW方面的方法一致性并不令人满意。在评估脂肪和去脂体重时,MF-BIA的可靠性似乎值得怀疑。DEXA与人体测量法之间的方法一致性似乎稍好一些。