Stark H J, Baur M, Breitkreutz D, Mirancea N, Fusenig N E
Division of Differentiation and Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Invest Dermatol. 1999 May;112(5):681-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00573.x.
Skin equivalents formed by keratinocytes cocultured with fibroblasts embedded in collagen lattices represent promising tools for mechanistic studies of skin physiology, for pharmacotoxicologic testing, and for the use as skin substitutes in wound treatment. Such cultures would be superior in defined media to avoid interference with components of serum or tissue extracts. Here we demonstrate that a defined medium (supplemented keratinocyte defined medium) supports epidermal morphogenesis in organotypic cocultures equally well as serum-containing medium (mixture of Ham's F12 and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium), as documented by hallmarks of the epidermal phenotype studied by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. In both cases regularly structured, orthokeratinized epithelia evolved with similar kinetics. Morphology in mixture of Ham's F12 and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was slightly hyperplastic, and keratins 1 and 10 synthesis less co-ordinated than in supplemented keratinocyte defined medium, but a consistently inverted sequence of expression of keratins 1 and 10 was found in either medium. The late differentiation markers filaggrin, involucrin, keratin 2e, and transglutaminase 1 corresponded in their typical distribution in upper suprabasal layers. Keratin 16 persisted under both conditions indicating the activated epidermal state. Keratinocyte proliferation was comparable in both media, whereas fibroblast multiplication and proliferation was delayed and reduced in supplemented keratinocyte defined medium. In both media, ultrastructural features of epidermal differentiation as well as reconstitution of a basement membrane occurred similarly. Immature lamellar bodies and cytoplasmatic vacuoles, however, indicated an impaired lipid metabolism in supplemented keratinocyte defined medium. Nevertheless, these defined organotypic cocultures provide a suitable basis for in vitro skin models to study molecular mechanisms of tissue homeostasis and for use in pharmacotoxicologic testing.
角质形成细胞与包埋在胶原蛋白晶格中的成纤维细胞共培养形成的皮肤等效物,是用于皮肤生理机制研究、药物毒理学测试以及作为伤口治疗皮肤替代物的有前景的工具。在限定培养基中进行此类培养会更好,以避免血清或组织提取物成分的干扰。在此我们证明,一种限定培养基(补充角质形成细胞限定培养基)在器官型共培养中支持表皮形态发生的效果与含血清培养基(Ham's F12和Dulbecco改良 Eagle培养基的混合物)同样好,这通过免疫荧光和电子显微镜研究的表皮表型特征得以证明。在这两种情况下,规则结构的正角化上皮均以相似的动力学方式演化。Ham's F12和Dulbecco改良 Eagle培养基混合物中的形态略有增生,角蛋白1和10的合成协调性不如补充角质形成细胞限定培养基,但在任何一种培养基中均发现角蛋白1和10的表达顺序始终倒置。晚期分化标志物丝聚蛋白、内披蛋白、角蛋白2e和转谷氨酰胺酶1在上层基底上层的典型分布相对应。角蛋白16在两种条件下均持续存在,表明表皮处于激活状态。两种培养基中的角质形成细胞增殖相当,而在补充角质形成细胞限定培养基中,成纤维细胞的增殖和繁殖延迟且减少。在两种培养基中,表皮分化的超微结构特征以及基底膜的重建情况相似。然而,未成熟板层小体和细胞质空泡表明补充角质形成细胞限定培养基中的脂质代谢受损。尽管如此,这些限定的器官型共培养为研究组织稳态分子机制的体外皮肤模型以及用于药物毒理学测试提供了合适的基础。