Scafidi F A, Field T, Prodromidis M, Abrams S M
Touch Research Institute, University of Miami, USA.
Adolescence. 1999 Spring;34(133):61-8.
Seventy-nine adolescent mothers (mean age = 18.1 years) were administered the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and three validity scales (L, F, and K) of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2). The aim was to determine whether low-BDI mothers were "faking good," or denying their depression. The adolescent mothers were assigned to a low-BDI group (scores = 0, 1, 2), a nondepressed group (scores = 3-9), or a depressed group (scores > or = 13). The depressed group had higher F (Symptom) scale scores than did the nondepressed group, which in turn had higher scores than did the low-BDI group. The low-BDI group, in contrast, had more fake-good profiles than did the two other groups. Discriminant analyses indicated that 90% of the fake-good profiles could be classified correctly based on BDI and K (Defensiveness) scale scores. These data suggest the need for further assessment when individuals have extremely low BDI scores.
对79名青少年母亲(平均年龄 = 18.1岁)进行了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)以及明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)的三个效度量表(L、F和K)的测试。目的是确定BDI得分低的母亲是否在“假装正常”,即否认自己的抑郁情绪。这些青少年母亲被分为BDI低分组合(得分 = 0、1、2)、非抑郁组(得分 = 3 - 9)或抑郁组(得分≥13)。抑郁组的F(症状)量表得分高于非抑郁组,而非抑郁组的得分又高于BDI低分组合。相比之下,BDI低分组合中“假装正常”的情况比其他两组更多。判别分析表明,基于BDI和K(防御性)量表得分,90%的“假装正常”情况能够被正确分类。这些数据表明,当个体的BDI得分极低时,需要进行进一步评估。