• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者精神评估的可靠性。

Reliability of psychiatric assessment in older patients.

作者信息

Copeland J, Kelleher M, Duckworth G, Smith A

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1976;7(4):313-22. doi: 10.2190/3dr2-7h3c-gg9l-aqc3.

DOI:10.2190/3dr2-7h3c-gg9l-aqc3
PMID:1024101
Abstract

A number of the causes of psychiatric diagnostic disagreement are discussed in this paper. The use of the Geriatric Mental Status interview to achieve diagnostic reliability is examined in three studies in which U.S.--U.K. Cross-National Project psychiatrists rated and diagnosed thirty-two British and twenty-one American patients. There were no systematic differences between U.S. and U.K. team members in their diagnoses; and agreement on six principal diagnostic categories was achieved in about three-quarters of the cases. The reliability fo the ratings of psychopathology that formed the basis for the diagnoses was satisfactory and is reported in detail.

摘要

本文讨论了导致精神科诊断分歧的一些原因。在三项研究中,对使用老年精神状态访谈来实现诊断可靠性进行了考察,其中美英跨国项目的精神科医生对32名英国患者和21名美国患者进行了评分和诊断。美英团队成员在诊断上没有系统性差异;在大约四分之三的病例中,在六个主要诊断类别上达成了一致。作为诊断基础的精神病理学评分的可靠性令人满意,并进行了详细报告。

相似文献

1
Reliability of psychiatric assessment in older patients.老年患者精神评估的可靠性。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1976;7(4):313-22. doi: 10.2190/3dr2-7h3c-gg9l-aqc3.
2
The geriatric mental status interview (GMS).老年精神状态访谈(GMS)。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1976;7(4):303-11. doi: 10.2190/a6gq-40dl-6jyx-8w5a.
3
Diagnostic differences among psychiatrists in the British Isles.不列颠群岛精神科医生之间的诊断差异。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Feb;24(1):64. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.1.64-d.
4
The Spanish Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Reliability and comparison with clinical diagnoses.西班牙诊断访谈量表。信度及与临床诊断的比较。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;40(11):1189-96. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790100035005.
5
Differences in usage of diagnostic labels amongst psychiatrists in the British isles.
Br J Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;118(547):629-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.118.547.629.
6
Psychiatric diagnosis in Japan. 2. Reliability of conventional diagnosis and discrepancies with Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis.
Psychopathology. 1989;22(5):250-9. doi: 10.1159/000284605.
7
Application of Research Diagnostic Criteria and International Classification of Diseases to case vignettes.将研究诊断标准和国际疾病分类应用于病例 vignettes。 (注:vignette 常见释义为“小插图;简介;病例记录片段”,这里结合语境可理解为病例记录片段 )
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 Feb;47(2):78-80.
8
A comparison of clinical and diagnostic interview schedule diagnoses. Physician reexamination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population.临床诊断与诊断访谈表诊断结果的比较。医生对普通人群中接受外行访谈的病例进行复查。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;42(7):657-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790300019003.
9
The ICD-10 clinical field trial for mental and behavioral disorders: results in Canada and the United States.国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)精神与行为障碍临床现场试验:加拿大和美国的结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;151(9):1340-50. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.9.1340.
10
The validity and reliability of diagnoses of work-related mental ill-health.与工作相关的精神健康问题诊断的有效性和可靠性。
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Nov;65(11):726-31. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.039008.