Gold M
J Ambul Care Manage. 1979 Feb;2(1):1-20. doi: 10.1097/00004479-197902000-00002.
A survey of the literature supports the broad generalization that primary care delivered in this hospital outpatient department will be more expensive than care provided in a free-standing setting. Among the reasons discussed by the author are: (1) reimbursement policies of third party insurors which mask and inflate the distribution of the true costs of care within the hospital; (2) lack of control by outpatient department directors over their own costs; (3) the degree to which the availability of sophisticated and expensive technology within the hospital setting encourages its utilization; and (4) the differences in case mix: "sicker" patients are seen in outpatient departments. Gold recognizes that most studies to date contain serious limitations in their generalizability; she concludes that additional studies are necessary to explain why the costs vary to the extent they do. She also suggests studying other issues such as access, consumer preferences, provider preferences and training requirements, and quality of care before reaching any decisions about the future of hospital-based primary care.
一项文献调查支持了这样一个广泛的普遍观点,即这家医院门诊部提供的初级保健服务比独立机构提供的护理成本更高。作者讨论的原因包括:(1)第三方保险公司的报销政策掩盖并夸大了医院内护理真实成本的分布;(2)门诊部主任对自身成本缺乏控制;(3)医院环境中先进且昂贵技术的可用性促使其被使用的程度;(4)病例组合的差异:门诊部接收的患者“病情更重”。戈尔德认识到,迄今为止的大多数研究在其普遍性方面存在严重局限性;她得出结论,需要进行更多研究来解释成本为何会有如此大的差异。她还建议在对医院初级保健的未来做出任何决定之前,研究其他问题,如可及性、消费者偏好、提供者偏好和培训要求以及护理质量。