Williamson J B
Group Pract. 1980 Apr;29(4):13-5, 25.
Just as any business enterprise involving many personal interactions, group practice medicine can suffer from organizational parallax, narrowed by time, and resulting from one-sided views of its own decision-making. Indeed, that is why accreditation reviews of groups take into account broad happenings within a medical practice as observed by outsiders. Aside from the all-important medical record, source materials for such reviews include questionnaires on the logical processes of care, educational activities of the staff in all departments, technological support, ethical considerations and overall environment. This article takes a look at quality assurance-in an innovative form--within group practice. The type of program detailed in it was first put to the test in 1975, by the St. Louis Park Medical Center, Minneapolis, in conjunction with a grant from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation to St. Louis Park, and to the Minneapolis-based firm InterStudy.
正如任何涉及众多人际互动的商业企业一样,团体医疗实践可能会受到组织视差的影响,这种视差会随着时间的推移而缩小,并且源于对自身决策的片面看法。事实上,这就是为什么团体的认证审查会考虑外部人员所观察到的医疗实践中的广泛情况。除了至关重要的医疗记录外,此类审查的原始资料还包括关于护理逻辑流程的问卷、所有部门员工的教育活动、技术支持、伦理考量以及整体环境。本文将以一种创新的形式审视团体医疗实践中的质量保证。文中详细介绍的该项目类型于1975年首次在明尼阿波利斯的圣路易斯公园医疗中心进行测试,该中心获得了W. K. 凯洛格基金会授予圣路易斯公园以及明尼阿波利斯的InterStudy公司的一笔赠款。