Suppr超能文献

社会流动性与社会阶层死亡率差异的解读

Social mobility and the interpretation of social class mortality differentials.

作者信息

Stern J

出版信息

J Soc Policy. 1983 Jan;12(1):27-49. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400012289.

Abstract

The discussion of health inequalities in Britain (e.g. in the Black Report) has been conducted largely on the basis of social class mortality differentials measured by achieved social class and not by social class of origin. It is shown in this paper that social class mortality differentials by achieved social class are not invariant to the rate of social mobility and that the use of them is likely to result in a biased measure of trends in health inequalities when the absolute rate of social mobility varies over time. It is further shown that if, as is likely, health status is a factor systematically affecting the probability for an individual of upward or downward social mobility, then an increase in the rate of social mobility may well result in constant or widening social class mortality differentials by achieved social class even if the differentials are narrowing when measured by social class of origin. It is claimed that this process may well explain why the observed social class mortality differentials, which are measured by achieved social class, have not fallen in Britain during the post-1945 period.

摘要

英国关于健康不平等的讨论(如在《布莱克报告》中),很大程度上是基于根据获得的社会阶层而非出身社会阶层衡量的社会阶层死亡率差异进行的。本文表明,按获得的社会阶层划分的社会阶层死亡率差异并非不受社会流动率的影响,并且当社会流动的绝对速率随时间变化时,使用这些差异可能会导致对健康不平等趋势的衡量产生偏差。进一步表明,如果健康状况很可能是系统影响个体向上或向下社会流动概率的一个因素,那么社会流动率的增加很可能导致按获得的社会阶层划分的社会阶层死亡率差异保持不变或扩大,即便按出身社会阶层衡量时这些差异正在缩小。据称,这一过程很可能解释了为何在1945年后的时期里,英国按获得的社会阶层衡量的观察到的社会阶层死亡率差异并未下降。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验