Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
作者信息
Reed T J, Allen H S
出版信息
Hosp Med Staff. 1984 May;13(5):2-9.
PMID:10266239
Abstract
If there is no evidence that a hospital is using market power to "force" its contracting physician upon patients and if the exclusive contract does not adversely affect price or quality, an exclusive arrangement should not violate the federal antitrust laws. These are the insights gained from the decision handed down by the Supreme Court in Hyde (Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde, No. 82-1031).
摘要
相似文献
1
Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
Hosp Med Staff. 1984 May;13(5):2-9.
2
Supreme Court relaxes exclusive contract rules in antitrust decision.最高法院在一项反垄断裁决中放宽了独家合同规则。
Trustee. 1984 Jun;37(6):34-8.
3
High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.高等法院放宽了海德案中的独家合同反垄断规则。
Hospitals. 1984 Jun 1;58(11):74-9.
4
Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations.
Bus Health. 1984 Sep;1(9):52-3.
5
The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision.美国最高法院审视医院与医生的关系：海德案判决
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1984 May-Jun;29(3):36-49.
6
Law-medicine notes. Exclusive hospital-medical service arrangements for anesthesiology: antitrust consequences.法律与医学笔记。麻醉学的独家医院-医疗服务安排：反垄断后果。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jul 26;311(4):243-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407263110407.
7
Antitrust aspects of exclusive contracts in medical imaging.
Radiology. 1985 Jul;156(1):237-41. doi: 10.1148/radiology.156.1.4001414.
8
Exclusive contracts with hospitals OK, Supreme Court rules.
Psychiatr News. 1984 May 4;19(9):1, 31.
9
Exclusive contracts under antitrust attack.遭受反垄断攻击的独家合同。
Hosp Med Staff. 1982 Nov;11(11):2-9.
10
Exclusive contracts--a new court interpretation.
AANA J. 1982 Dec;50(6):583-4.
Zotero 插件