• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物使用指南,第3部分:项目接受度评估。

Drug usage guidelines, Part 3: assessment of acceptance of the program.

作者信息

Patry R A, Huber S L, Rice G, Hudson H D, Godwin H N

出版信息

Hosp Formul. 1985 Apr;20(4):464, 470-4.

PMID:10270728
Abstract

The Drug Usage Guidelines (DUG) program, as perceived by the members of the P & T Committee and by physicians who had prepared and submitted DUGs, was demonstrated to be an effective method for evaluating drugs for formulary inclusion. The majority of P & T members felt that the DUG program had strengthened the drug review process without being too tedious or preventing the addition of valuable drugs to the formulary. Sixty-eight percent of physicians who had submitted a DUG expressed the opinion that it served as a vehicle for providing educational information on rational therapeutics. A majority of respondents stated that they would recommend the DUG program to other hospitals.

摘要

药物使用指南(DUG)项目,在药品与治疗学委员会成员以及编写并提交了DUG的医生看来,被证明是一种评估药物以纳入药品目录的有效方法。大多数药品与治疗学委员会成员认为,DUG项目加强了药物审查过程,既不过于繁琐,也没有妨碍将有价值的药物添加到药品目录中。提交了DUG的医生中有68%表示,它是提供合理治疗学教育信息的一种手段。大多数受访者表示,他们会向其他医院推荐DUG项目。

相似文献

1
Drug usage guidelines, Part 3: assessment of acceptance of the program.药物使用指南,第3部分:项目接受度评估。
Hosp Formul. 1985 Apr;20(4):464, 470-4.
2
Strengthening the formulary system by implementing a drug usage guidelines program.
Hosp Formul. 1984 Aug;19(8):664-8.
3
Drug usage guidelines, Part 2: Analysis of program outcome.药物使用指南,第2部分:项目成果分析。
Hosp Formul. 1985 Jan;20(1):57-60.
4
Drug usage review in a community hospital.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1975 Oct;32(10):1014-7.
5
Communicating P & T guidelines: how one committee meets the challenge.传达药品和治疗指南:一个委员会如何应对挑战。
Hosp Formul. 1987 Jul;22(7):651-4, 657.
6
P & T Committee perspectives: maintaining a successful formulary system in a private community hospital.药品与治疗委员会观点:在私立社区医院维持一个成功的药品目录系统
Hosp Formul. 1990 Apr;25(4):423-6, 428, 430.
7
The effect of an education program on cefazolin prescribing.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Apr;42(2):69-71.
8
A survey of selective administration procedures in formulary maintenance.药品目录维护中的选择性给药程序调查。
Hosp Pharm. 1981 Jul;15(7):371-4, 378-80.
9
Formulary streamlining through therapeutic class review.
Hosp Pharm. 1995 Apr;30(4):287-90.
10
An inside look at the UCLA P&T committee: how does it influence prescribing practices?
Hosp Formul. 1986 Feb;21(2):214-7.