• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估物理治疗专业学生的临床能力。第2部分:评估一种新工具的信度、效度和可用性。

Evaluating clinical competence of physical therapy students. Part 2: assessing the reliability, validity and usability of a new instrument.

作者信息

Loomis J

出版信息

Physiother Can. 1985 Mar-Apr;37(2):91-8.

PMID:10270853
Abstract

This study was conducted to establish the reliablity and validity of an instrument designed to evaluate the clinical competence of physical therapy (PT) students. A criterion-referenced evaluation instrument--the Evaluation of Clinical Competence (ECC)--was developed by the investigator according to the procedures recommended in the measurement literature. This behaviourally-anchored, four-point rating scale was tested on two groups of PT students from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. In order to obtain data by which to analyze and revise the ECC, the ECC was administered to fourth-year PT students (n = 29) during their clinical placement in November 1982, according to specified instructions. The revised ECC was administered to third-year (n = 23) and fourth-year PT students (n = 25) during their clinical placements in February and March of 1983. The same instructions were followed in order to collect the necessary data to establish inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity of the ECC. The results of the study suggest that the ECC is a fairly reliable, valid, and practical instrument with which to assess the clinical competence of PT students.

摘要

本研究旨在确定一种用于评估物理治疗(PT)专业学生临床能力的工具的可靠性和有效性。研究者根据测量文献中推荐的程序开发了一种标准参照评估工具——临床能力评估(ECC)。这种基于行为的四点量表在加拿大埃德蒙顿阿尔伯塔大学的两组PT专业学生中进行了测试。为了获取用于分析和修订ECC的数据,1982年11月,按照特定说明,将ECC施测于四年级PT专业学生(n = 29),当时他们正在进行临床实习。修订后的ECC于1983年2月和3月施测于三年级(n = 23)和四年级PT专业学生(n = 25),当时他们正在进行临床实习。遵循相同的说明以收集必要数据,以确定ECC的评分者间信度、同时效度和结构效度。研究结果表明,ECC是一种相当可靠、有效且实用的工具,可用于评估PT专业学生的临床能力。

相似文献

1
Evaluating clinical competence of physical therapy students. Part 2: assessing the reliability, validity and usability of a new instrument.评估物理治疗专业学生的临床能力。第2部分:评估一种新工具的信度、效度和可用性。
Physiother Can. 1985 Mar-Apr;37(2):91-8.
2
Evaluating clinical competence of physical therapy students. Part 1: the development of an instrument.评估物理治疗专业学生的临床能力。第1部分:一种评估工具的开发。
Physiother Can. 1985 Mar-Apr;37(2):83-9.
3
Validation of the Revised Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI): Version 2006.验证修订后的物理治疗师临床绩效工具(PT CPI):2006 年版。
Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;92(3):416-28. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110129. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.开发一个有效且可靠的临床操作自我效能感量表。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00685.x.
5
The development and testing of APTA Clinical Performance Instruments. American Physical Therapy Association.美国物理治疗协会APTA临床性能评估工具的开发与测试。
Phys Ther. 2002 Apr;82(4):329-53.
6
A performance rating scale for evaluating clinical competence of occupational therapy students.一种用于评估职业治疗专业学生临床能力的绩效评级量表。
Am J Occup Ther. 1975 Feb;29(2):81-6.
7
Use of the blue MACS: acceptance by clinical instructors and self-reports of adherence.蓝色磁性激活细胞分选系统的使用:临床教师的接受度及自我报告的依从性
Phys Ther. 2000 Jul;80(7):652-61.
8
A clinical assessment tool used for physiotherapy students--is it reliable?一种用于物理治疗专业学生的临床评估工具——它可靠吗?
Physiother Theory Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(2):121-34. doi: 10.1080/09593980701508894.
9
Criteria, purposes, and methods for evaluating the clinical competence of students in the allied health professions.联合健康专业学生临床能力评估的标准、目的和方法。
J Allied Health. 1983 May;12(2):85-94.
10
Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.评估学生的沟通技巧:整体评分的验证
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):583-92. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9074-2. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance: A New Tool to Assess Physiotherapy Students' Performance in Clinical Education.《加拿大物理治疗临床实践评估的发展:一种评估物理治疗专业学生临床教育表现的新工具》
Physiother Can. 2015 Aug;67(3):281-9. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-29E.
2
Scoring of the physical therapist clinical performance instrument (PT-CPI): analysis of 7 years of use.物理治疗师临床绩效工具(PT-CPI)评分:7年使用情况分析。
Physiother Can. 2010 Spring;62(2):147-54. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.2.147. Epub 2010 Apr 23.