Grant M K
Health Prog. 1987 Jan-Feb;68(1):50-9.
The transition in religious-sponsored health care from a ministry of direct service to one of governance has generated serious and penetrating questions, analyses, and retrenchment. Emphasis on and demand for value-laden leadership development programs are growing at the same time that sponsoring groups are becoming more actively involved in the governance and oversight of their corporate ministries. Two recent Catholic Health Association (CHA) studies focused on the critical governance relationship between the sponsoring group and its incorporated ministries. The first study asked religious institutes and dioceses that were sponsors of CHA member health care freestanding facilities and systems to describe their current governance structure. The second study represented an initial attempt to identify qualitative components of effective governance or sponsorship and asked 19 major superiors and system chief executive officers (CEOs) to characterize an ideal relationship between sponsor and ministry. The studies' findings included the following: In freestanding facilities, lay-religious governing boards have all but replaced the all-sponsor and all-lay advisory boards of the past. Trustee orientation, development, and evaluation were not equally stressed in the three groups surveyed, with trustee evaluation programs lagging behind in all three. Major superiors and CEOs had remarkably similar expectations relating to accountability for mission, relationships between sponsor and corporation, communication, and leadership development. Both major superiors and CEOs looked for greater collaboration in defining roles, translating mission into "business plan", and developing formation programs for leadership. Major superiors' emphasized simplicity of life-style, whereas the CEOs stressed stable commitment to corporate ministry.
宗教赞助的医疗保健从直接服务部门向治理部门的转变引发了严肃且深刻的问题、分析和调整。在赞助团体越来越积极地参与其公司部门的治理和监督的同时,对注重价值观的领导力发展项目的重视和需求也在增加。天主教医疗协会(CHA)最近的两项研究聚焦于赞助团体与其附属部门之间关键的治理关系。第一项研究要求作为CHA成员独立医疗保健设施和系统赞助商的宗教机构和教区描述其当前的治理结构。第二项研究初步尝试确定有效治理或赞助的定性要素,并要求19位主要上级和系统首席执行官(CEO)描述赞助商与部门之间的理想关系。研究结果如下:在独立设施中,世俗 - 宗教治理委员会几乎取代了过去的全赞助商和全世俗咨询委员会。在所调查的三组中,受托人定位、发展和评估并未得到同等重视,在所有三组中受托人评估项目都滞后。主要上级和CEO在使命问责、赞助商与公司之间的关系、沟通以及领导力发展方面有着非常相似的期望。主要上级和CEO都希望在明确角色、将使命转化为“商业计划”以及制定领导力培养计划方面加强合作。主要上级强调生活方式的简朴,而CEO则强调对公司部门的稳定承诺。