• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国民医疗服务体系中患者费用的增加:一种将初级医疗保健私有化的方式。

Increasing patient charges in the National Health Service: a method of privatizing primary care.

作者信息

Birch S

出版信息

J Soc Policy. 1986 Apr;15(2):163-84. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001653.

DOI:10.1017/s0047279400001653
PMID:10280414
Abstract

Frequent increases in the real value of National Health Service (NHS) patient charges have been made since the Conservative Party's return to office in 1979. For those patients subject to these charges the increases have led to a substantial reduction in the level of subsidization of the cost of the service. The rationale for the subsidization of health care is shown to be unrelated to 'ability to pay' considerations. Consequently the 'backdoor privatization' of these services is inconsistent with the objectives of the NHS even though the Government has continually committed itself to these objectives. Alternative policies to increasing patient charges are suggested which would encourage the efficient use of NHS resources without compromising NHS objectives.

摘要

自1979年保守党重新执政以来,国民医疗服务体系(NHS)患者费用的实际价值频繁上涨。对于那些需支付这些费用的患者来说,费用上涨导致了服务成本补贴水平的大幅降低。事实表明,医疗保健补贴的基本原理与“支付能力”考量无关。因此,这些服务的“变相私有化”与国民医疗服务体系的目标不一致,尽管政府一直致力于实现这些目标。文中提出了替代提高患者费用的政策,这些政策将鼓励有效利用国民医疗服务体系的资源,同时又不损害国民医疗服务体系的目标。

相似文献

1
Increasing patient charges in the National Health Service: a method of privatizing primary care.英国国民医疗服务体系中患者费用的增加:一种将初级医疗保健私有化的方式。
J Soc Policy. 1986 Apr;15(2):163-84. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001653.
2
Rethinking primary care user fees: is charging a fee for appointments a solution to NHS underfunding?重新思考初级医疗保健用户费用:对预约收取费用是解决国民保健制度资金不足的办法吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jun;69(683):280-281. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X703793.
3
Health care charges: lessons from the U.K.医疗保健费用:来自英国的经验教训
Health Policy. 1989 Nov;13(2):145-57. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90069-9.
4
Charging for health care: evidence on the utilisation of NHS prescribed drugs.医疗保健收费:关于国民保健制度处方药使用情况的证据
Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(6):681-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90022-5.
5
Margaret McCartney: Charging patients won't solve the NHS's problems.玛格丽特·麦卡特尼:向患者收费无法解决英国国民医疗服务体系的问题。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 6;356:j611. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j611.
6
From general practice to primary care: the industrialisation of family medicine in Britain.从全科医疗到初级保健:英国家庭医学的工业化
J Public Health Policy. 2002;23(1):33-43.
7
Should NHS patients be allowed to pay extra for their care? Charges for NHS dental care have led to privatisation.国民保健署的病人应该被允许为他们的治疗支付额外费用吗?国民保健署牙科护理收费导致了私有化。
BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):110.
8
Capital charges: a tax on the NHS. Worse may follow as NHS assets are privatised.资本费用:对国民医疗服务体系的一种征税。随着国民医疗服务体系资产被私有化,情况可能会变得更糟。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):157-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7152.157.
9
The relevance of the U.S. experience to the reforms in the British National Health Service: the case of General Practitioner Fund Holding.美国经验与英国国民医疗服务体系改革的相关性:以全科医生基金持有制为例。
Int J Health Serv. 1991;21(3):381-7. doi: 10.2190/VK9M-FJ96-C4PD-Y085.
10
Public attitudes to charging for some National Health Service services.
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Feb;36(4):565-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90417-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Charging the patient to save the system? Like bailing water with a sieve.向患者收费以拯救医疗系统?这就像用筛子舀水一样。
CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1812-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040699.
2
The creeping privatisation of NHS prescribing.国民保健制度处方的渐进式私有化。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 10;309(6955):623-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.623.