Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
作者信息
Halper H R, Kazon P M
出版信息
Bus Health. 1987 Mar;4(5):51-2.
PMID:10280673
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
Bus Health. 1987 Mar;4(5):51-2.
2
"Blues interfered illegally with HMO.".
Mod Healthc. 1987 Nov 20;17(24):12.
3
Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1988 Spring;4:227-72.
4
Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim.
Bus Health. 1988 Nov;6(1):44-5.
5
Antitrust assault on hospital-Blue Cross relations.
Tex Hosp. 1984 Feb;39(9):46-7.
6
Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
Hospitals. 1986 Nov 5;60(21):36.
7
8
Ball Memorial Hospital: Section 2 Sherman Act analysis in the alternative health care delivery market.
Am J Law Med. 1988;14(2-3):249-79.
9
On "FTC Sings the Blues" and its respondents.关于《联邦贸易委员会诉苦》及其回应者。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1982 Summer;7(2):547-58.
10
U.S. District Court finds Blue Shield physician payment method violates Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act.美国地方法院认定蓝盾医保公司的医生支付方式违反了《谢尔曼法》第一条。
Health Law Vigil. 1984 Mar 30;7(7):4-7.
Zotero 插件