Contribution of medical decision-making to consensus development conferences.
作者信息
Klazinga N S, Casparie A F, van Everdingen J J
出版信息
Health Policy. 1987;8(3):339-46. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(87)90009-1.
PMID:10285390
Abstract
A description is given of the consensus development conference as a method for either technology assessment or quality assurance in health care. The general features of the methodology are discussed, the Dutch approach is explained in more detail, and medical decision analysis and its potential contribution to consensus development are described. Examples are given of the use of this technique during 6 of the 22 consensus conferences held in The Netherlands since 1982.
摘要
相似文献
1
Contribution of medical decision-making to consensus development conferences.
Health Policy. 1987;8(3):339-46. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(87)90009-1.
2
Format and conduct of consensus development conferences. Multi-nation comparison.共识发展会议的形式与开展。多国比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(3):450-69. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300001045.
3
Consensus development conferences in Sweden. Effects on health policy and administration.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(1):75-88. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300003287.
4
A consensus process on management of major burns accidents: lessons learned from the café fire in Volendam, The Netherlands.重大烧伤事故管理的共识过程：从荷兰福伦丹咖啡馆火灾中吸取的教训
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):243-52. doi: 10.1108/14777260610662762.
5
[Preliminary evaluation of Chile's First Citizen Consensus Conference].[智利首次公民共识会议的初步评估]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 May;15(5):351-7. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000500014.
6
Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives.不同国家的共识会议。目标与观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(2):305-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300004104.
7
Evaluation of the consensus conference program in Sweden. Its impact on physicians.瑞典共识会议项目评估：其对医生的影响
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(1):89-94. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300003299.
8
[Consensus about consensus. A critical consideration of the procedure of the CBO-consensus development (Central Support Organ for Peer Review)].关于共识的共识。对CBO共识发展程序（同行评审中央支持机构）的批判性思考
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Jun 16;134(24):1186-9.
9
Concepts of quality and the provision of periodontal care: a survey.牙周护理的质量概念与提供情况：一项调查
J Periodontol. 1998 Feb;69(2):228-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.228.
10
Guidelines to shape clinical practice. The role of medical societies: the Dutch experience in comparison with recent developments in the American approach.塑造临床实践的指南。医学协会的作用：荷兰的经验与美国方法的最新发展比较。
Health Policy. 1991 Aug;18(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90026-t.
Zotero 插件